Vehicle Contact Detection Using Multi-Sensor Frequency Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting minor damage or contacts on vehicles are limited by strong sensor signals during driving maneuvers, making it difficult to distinguish small damages from driving-related signals, and current systems rely heavily on signal strength which is not effective for detecting minor impacts.

Innovation Solution

The method evaluates and compares signal strength-independent properties, such as frequency, from multiple sensors placed at different points on the vehicle to differentiate between minor damage and driving maneuvers, using acceleration signals to detect small and minor impacts by determining the frequency properties of the contact and comparing them with signal strength-dependent properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If signal strength is used for damage detection, then strong impacts are detected effectively, but minor contacts are masked by driving maneuver signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage detection sensitivityVSAvoidminor contact detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the evaluation parameter from signal strength (amplitude) to signal frequency characteristics. By analyzing frequency-dependent properties rather than signal magnitude, the system can distinguish minor contacts from driving maneuvers even when the latter produce stronger signals. This parameter transformation allows simultaneous detection of both strong impacts and subtle contacts that were previously masked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used to improve detection accuracy, then local damage can be distinguished from global maneuvers, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact localization accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the vehicle into multiple monitoring zones with sensors positioned at strategic locations (front, rear, sides). Each sensor monitors its local region, and by comparing signals from different segments, the system can distinguish local contacts from global driving maneuvers. This segmentation approach improves detection precision while keeping the system manageable through modular sensor placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-generated harmful factors

If signal evaluation focuses on amplitude, then clear impacts are detected, but the ability to separate local excitations from global maneuvers is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact detection capabilityVSAvoidsignal source differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the signal evaluation from amplitude-based to frequency-based analysis. By examining frequency-dependent properties of the signals, the system can differentiate between local contact excitations and global driving maneuver signals. This parameter change enables simultaneous detection of impact severity and source differentiation, resolving the contradiction between detecting harmful factors and identifying their origins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240369593A1Method for detecting contacts on a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20240369593A1 patent drawing
  • US20240369593A1 patent drawing
  • US20240369593A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting contacts on a vehicle. In the method, signals from at least two sensor are evaluated and compared to one another, wherein at least one signal strength-independent property of the signals is taken into account.