Vehicle Control Apparatus Abnormality Detection Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In vehicle control devices with two calculation processing portions, the increased complexity and cost of the monitoring portion, which performs the same calculations as the monitoring object, lead to higher costs without a proportional increase in reliability.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device design where the second calculation processing portion acquires the same input value as the first and detects abnormalities based on the comparison between the input value and the calculation result, or a predefined highly safe state value, allowing for reduced configuration complexity and cost without compromising reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the monitoring portion has the same configuration as the monitoring object to ensure reliability, then the reliability of calculation result is improved, but the cost and scale of the monitoring portion increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of calculation resultVSAvoidconfiguration complexity of monitoring portion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified copy of the monitoring function that only replicates the essential calculation logic needed for abnormality detection, rather than copying the entire complex configuration. The monitoring portion uses a reduced version that focuses only on comparing input values with expected output patterns, eliminating the need to duplicate complex fail-safe calculations and large ROM requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the critical monitoring function from the complex calculation processing, separating the abnormality detection capability from the full calculation logic. This allows the monitoring portion to use a simplified configuration that only includes the necessary input value processing and comparison logic, while the complex fail-safe calculation logic remains in the monitoring object only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the monitoring portion performs the same fail-safe calculation as the monitoring object, then abnormality detection is improved, but the cost of ROM and overall device increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection capabilityVSAvoidROM capacity and device cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a lightweight copy of the monitoring function that only replicates the essential calculation logic needed for abnormality detection, rather than copying the entire complex configuration. The monitoring portion uses a reduced version that focuses only on comparing input values with expected output patterns, eliminating the need to duplicate complex fail-safe calculations and large ROM requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring portion performs only the minimum necessary calculation action to detect abnormalities - specifically, it processes input values through a simplified logic that checks whether output values fall within expected ranges. This partial action approach provides sufficient abnormality detection without requiring the full fail-safe calculation capability, thereby reducing ROM requirements and device cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the calculation logic becomes more complex to handle all vehicle situations, then the reliability is improved, but the monitoring portion requires larger scale and higher cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of calculation resultVSAvoidlogic complexity and scale
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the calculation system into two distinct parts: the monitoring object that handles complex fail-safe calculations for all vehicle situations, and the monitoring portion that handles only simple input value processing and output verification. This segmentation allows the complex logic to be isolated to where it is needed while keeping the monitoring portion simple and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of complexity to different parts of the system - the monitoring object receives full complex logic capability to handle all vehicle situations, while the monitoring portion uses simplified logic appropriate only for its verification function. This local quality approach ensures reliability where needed while avoiding unnecessary complexity and cost in the monitoring portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9416870B2Vehicle control apparatus
Publication Date: 2016.08.16 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9416870B2 patent drawing
  • US9416870B2 patent drawing
  • US9416870B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device includes: a first calculation processing portion outputting a calculation result based on an input value; and a second calculation processing portion acquiring the same input value as the input value of the first calculation processing portion, the second calculation processing portion detecting an abnormality of the first calculation processing portion based on comparison between the input value of the second calculation processing portion and the calculation result of the first calculation processing portion or based on whether the calculation result is a predefined highly safe state value at which a relatively high safety state of a vehicle is acquired.