Vehicle Traffic Control Method Selection for Faster Check-In

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traffic systems face inefficiencies in selecting and coordinating control methods between vehicles and infrastructure due to the variety of control methods available, leading to complex data exchange and inconsistent information transfer.

Innovation Solution

A traffic system with a control unit and communication unit that registers vehicles, verifies applicable control methods, and selects a preferred method based on vehicle data, allowing efficient coordination through wireless communication and sensor-based identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple control methods are supported by the traffic system, then the system can accommodate different vehicle types and control capabilities, but the complexity of data exchange and coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different vehicle control methodsVSAvoidcomplexity of data exchange and coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by verifying which control methods the vehicle supports during registration, before the vehicle actually enters the traffic system. This advance verification stores the compatible control methods in the traffic system's database, so that during subsequent operations, the system can quickly select from pre-verified methods without complex real-time coordination. The check-in process further refines this by selecting a preferred control method based on current traffic conditions and vehicle characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If control method selection is made during each entry, then the system can optimize for current conditions, but the time required for vehicle entry and setup increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of vehicle controlVSAvoidtime for control method selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification of control method compatibility during vehicle registration, storing this information in advance. This eliminates the need for time-consuming control method negotiations during each entry event. When a vehicle checks in, the system retrieves the pre-stored compatibility information and quickly selects an appropriate control method based on current conditions, significantly reducing entry time while maintaining optimization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts control method selection based on real-time conditions. During check-in, the control unit evaluates current traffic conditions, vehicle characteristics, and operational requirements to select the most suitable control method from the pre-verified options. This dynamic selection process balances the need for speed with the need for optimization, allowing the system to respond flexibly to changing conditions without excessive delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Extent of automation

If the traffic system selects the control method, then centralized control is improved, but the vehicle's autonomy and self-control capability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized control capabilityVSAvoidvehicle autonomy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic control where the control unit selects control methods based on real-time evaluation of traffic conditions, vehicle characteristics, and operational requirements. This dynamic approach allows the vehicle to maintain autonomy when conditions permit, while seamlessly transitioning to higher levels of centralized control when safety or efficiency requires it. The vehicle's self-control capability is preserved through optional control methods that allow vehicle-initiated actions, while centralized control is activated selectively based on system decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260021827A1Traffic system for controlling vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US20260021827A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021827A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021827A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A traffic system for controlling vehicle, wherein the traffic system controls a vehicle located in a traffic area, comprises a control unit and a communication unit for communication between the traffic system and the vehicle, wherein the traffic system can control the vehicle by at least two different control methods, having the following steps before entering the traffic system for the first time, registering the vehicle and verifying which of the control methods can be applied, checking in before each further entry into the traffic system, wherein during check-in a preferred control method is selected from the control methods applicable to the vehicle, in particular by the control unit, and the vehicle is moved through the traffic area using the selected control method.