Vehicle Control Circuit Failure Management Strategy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous driving systems face risks when apparatus failures occur during operation, potentially endangering drivers, as existing systems lack effective strategies to manage and mitigate these failures.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus and method that includes external sensors, vehicle sensors, a steering device, acceleration/deceleration device, output device, communication circuit, and control circuit to detect failures, output warning signals, control speed reduction, and maintain lane position, with strategies tailored to different failure categories, including stopping the vehicle and activating hazard lights.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous driving system operates without failure management strategy, then system complexity is reduced, but driver safety deteriorates when failures occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The failure management strategy is segmented into distinct time intervals (first time interval for warning, second time interval for speed reduction, third time interval for stopping). This segmentation allows the system to handle failures in a structured manner without requiring overly complex real-time decision-making, thus improving driver safety while keeping the control system manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting failures early and issuing warnings to the driver before actual dangerous conditions develop. The control circuit detects failures in the autonomous driving system and outputs warning signals to the output device, allowing the driver to take preventive actions before safety is compromised.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If failure warning is provided continuously, then driver awareness is improved, but driver distraction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure information transmissionVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The warning signal is output periodically or at specific intervals rather than continuously. The control circuit outputs warning signals to the output device at defined time intervals, ensuring the driver receives failure information without being constantly distracted by continuous alerts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If vehicle speed is reduced immediately upon failure detection, then safety is improved, but driving efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoiddriving efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts vehicle speed based on the detected failure type and severity. The control circuit controls the acceleration/deceleration device to reduce vehicle speed to a target speed during the second time interval, and may stop the vehicle during the third time interval. This dynamic adjustment balances safety requirements with driving efficiency by not immediately stopping for all failure types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (vehicle speed) based on failure conditions. The control circuit modifies the speed parameter from normal operating speed to a reduced target speed, and potentially to zero, depending on the failure type and time interval, thereby maintaining safety while minimizing impact on driving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If multiple control actions are taken for different failure types, then failure response accuracy is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidcontrol strategy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different control strategies tailored to specific failure types and locations. The control circuit determines the type of failure and applies appropriate responses: speed reduction for less critical failures, complete stopping for critical failures, and selective activation of safety devices. This localized approach improves response accuracy while managing complexity through structured decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10933883B2Driving control apparatus and method for vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10933883B2 patent drawing
  • US10933883B2 patent drawing
  • US10933883B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving control apparatus for a vehicle includes: one or more external sensors, one or more vehicle sensors, a steering device, an acceleration/deceleration device, an output device, a communication circuit, and a control circuit. The control circuit detects a failure associated with autonomous driving while the vehicle performs the autonomous driving, outputs the warning signal for a transfer of control of the vehicle by using the output device for a first time interval, when the failure is detected, controls the acceleration/deceleration device for a second time interval after the first time interval to reduce a travel speed of the vehicle to a target speed, and controls the steering device and the acceleration/deceleration device after the second time interval to maintain a travel lane of the vehicle with the travel speed lower than the target speed.