Vehicle Control System Countersteering for Secondary Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems are inadequate in preventing secondary collisions when a vehicle is pushed off course by another vehicle cutting into its lane, particularly in situations where oncoming traffic emerges suddenly, leading to potential collisions with roadside hazards.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that read in hazard area and approach information to ascertain collision parameters, generating a control signal for countersteering to prevent the vehicle from colliding with hazards by determining a counter momentum value and timing the steering intervention to avoid excessive or insufficient countersteering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a fixed distance from roadway markings is maintained to keep the vehicle centered, then lane keeping stability is improved, but the ability to respond to sudden hazards is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane keeping stabilityVSAvoidhazard response reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the steering intervention based on real-time hazard detection and collision parameter calculation. When a hazard is detected and collision risk is assessed, the system transitions from passive lane centering to active countersteering, optimizing the balance between stability and hazard response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors surroundings sensors, calculates collision parameters, and adjusts steering control accordingly. The feedback loop includes reading hazard area information, calculating collision parameters, determining counter momentum, and generating control signals to steer away from hazards while maintaining lane centering when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If countersteering is applied to prevent secondary collisions, then safety is improved, but the risk of excessive steering intervention is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidexcessive steering intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates collision parameters and determines the required counter momentum in advance of the actual collision. By reading approach information and hazard area data beforehand, the system prepares the optimal steering intervention to counteract the impending collision force while avoiding excessive steering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically calculates the counter momentum parameter based on collision parameters, vehicle mass, and hazard position. The control signal magnitude and timing are continuously adjusted according to the calculated parameters, ensuring the steering intervention is sufficient to prevent secondary collision but not excessive to cause loss of control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the vehicle is pushed off course by another vehicle, then lane position stability is worsened, but the risk of secondary collision with hazards increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane position stabilityVSAvoidsecondary collision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system reads in approach information and hazard area information in advance, calculates collision parameters before the collision occurs, and determines the necessary countersteering action. This preliminary preparation allows the system to respond immediately when pushed off course, steering the vehicle away from hazards before secondary collision can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10562527B2Method and device for controlling a vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US10562527B2 patent drawing
  • US10562527B2 patent drawing
  • US10562527B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a vehicle. A piece of hazard area information, which represents at least one hazard area in the surroundings of the vehicle, and a piece of approach information, which represents an approach to the vehicle of at least one further vehicle driving next to the vehicle, are read in. Using the approach information, at least one collision parameter of a collision between the vehicle and the further vehicle is ascertained. Finally, a control signal is generated, using the collision parameter and the hazard area information, to steer the vehicle in a direction facing away from the hazard area.