Vehicle Control Logic Timestamping for Data Validity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems struggle with dynamically rearranging sensor arrangement control logics and data management due to lack of timestamping and hard-coded instructions, leading to data validity issues and inefficiencies in complex vehicle infrastructures.

Innovation Solution

Segmenting control instructions into functional units that process and timestamp sensor data items, allowing for dynamic reorganization and ensuring correct data interpretation through timestamp assignment, interpolation, and storage of output history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If control instructions are hard-coded and sensor data is not timestamped, then the system structure is simple, but data validity cannot be ensured and dynamic reorganization is impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validityVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments control instructions into individual functional units that can be dynamically arranged and reorganized. Each functional unit processes specific sensor data items and produces output data items. This segmentation enables flexible reconfiguration of control logic without requiring complete hard-coded programs, thereby ensuring data validity while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by assigning timestamps to sensor data items before they are processed by functional units. This timestamp assignment occurs in advance, allowing the system to later validate data freshness and correctness without adding complexity to the core processing logic. The timestamps are pre-attached to data items, enabling reliable operation throughout the control flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If sensor data items are not timestamped, then the system requires fewer resources, but data ordering and validity cannot be guaranteed in complex vehicle infrastructures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata orderingVSAvoidprocessing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the timestamping function as a separate, dedicated operation that is applied to sensor data items independently of the main control logic processing. This extraction allows timestamp assignment to be performed efficiently without burdening the core control processing resources. The timestamps are taken out as a preliminary step, enabling reliable data ordering while minimizing impact on overall system resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If control instructions are dynamically rearranged without timestamps, then the system is more flexible, but data confusion occurs due to bus system delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic reorganizationVSAvoiddata validity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments control instructions into discrete functional units that can be dynamically rearranged in different sequences. Each functional unit is self-contained and processes specific data items with associated timestamps. This segmentation enables flexible reconfiguration of control logic to adapt to different operating conditions while the timestamps on each data item provide a reliable reference for validating data freshness and correctness, preventing data confusion even when processing sequences change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If timestamps are assigned to all sensor data items, then data validity is ensured, but hardware resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flow securityVSAvoidhardware resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using timestamps as multi-functional elements that serve multiple purposes within the control system. The timestamps not only provide data validity verification but also enable data ordering, support dynamic reorganization of functional units, and facilitate debugging and monitoring. This multi-functionality of timestamps reduces the need for separate mechanisms for each function, thereby limiting the increase in hardware resources while ensuring comprehensive control flow security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3270286B1Vehicle control logic considering timestamps
Publication Date: 2019.03.06 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • EP3270286B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3270286B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3270286B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention is directed towards a method for reliably operating a vehicle control logic as well as a respectively arranged control device arrangement. Furthermore, a computer program comprising instructions for implementing the suggested method when executed on a computer is suggested. The present invention allows a control system to be operated securely and is therefore suitable for implementation of robust systems.