Automated Vehicle Control With Trajectory Deviation Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic vehicle control systems, such as automatic valet parking, rely heavily on infrastructure sensors, but lack robust mechanisms to verify infrastructure reliability and react to unforeseen events, particularly in complex environments like parking garages with obstacles or people.

Innovation Solution

A method for automatically controlling a vehicle that includes receiving driving specifications from an external infrastructure, deviating from the specified trajectory in a test mode to verify infrastructure detection, and sending error signals if the infrastructure fails to respond, allowing the vehicle to switch back to normal mode upon receiving a response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the vehicle relies on infrastructure sensors for automatic control, then the device complexity of the vehicle is reduced, but the reliability of the system decreases due to inability to verify infrastructure reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle sensor systemVSAvoidautomatic control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle performs preliminary actions by intentionally deviating from the specified trajectory before actual operation to test whether the infrastructure detects the deviation. This advance verification ensures the infrastructure is functioning correctly before relying on it for normal operation, thereby resolving the contradiction between reduced vehicle complexity and system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring whether the infrastructure responds to intentional deviations. The vehicle sends test deviations and evaluates the infrastructure's response to determine if it is functioning correctly. This feedback mechanism allows the vehicle to verify infrastructure reliability without adding complex sensors, balancing simplicity with reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the vehicle follows the specified trajectory without deviations, then the productivity is maintained, but the reliability verification capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle operation efficiencyVSAvoidinfrastructure detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle performs periodic trajectory deviations at scheduled intervals during normal operation. These periodic test deviations allow the system to verify infrastructure reliability without continuously deviating, thus maintaining productivity while periodically confirming system reliability. The deviations are temporary and the vehicle returns to the normal trajectory after verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If the vehicle deviates from the specified trajectory to test infrastructure, then the reliability verification is improved, but the loss of time occurs during testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfrastructure reliability verificationVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle performs partial deviations from the trajectory - small, controlled deviations that are sufficient to test infrastructure detection capability without excessive deviation. This partial action approach verifies reliability while minimizing the time lost during testing, as the vehicle only needs to deviate enough to trigger infrastructure detection, not perform large unnecessary maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12578737B2Method for automatically controlling a vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US12578737B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically controlling a vehicle based on a driving specification received from an external infrastructure. In a normal mode the vehicle is controlled along a trajectory specified thereby and in a test mode the vehicle is controlled along a test trajectory that deviates from the trajectory specified by the driving specification, and/or is controlled using test parameters. This allows the reliable operation of the infrastructure to be verified.