Vehicle Control Device Optimizing Driver Readiness Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle control systems lack an efficient method to optimize the switching between autonomous and manual driving modes, particularly in ensuring the driver is ready to take control before reaching a manual driving mode transition point, leading to potential safety risks due to timing mismatches between vehicle arrival and driver readiness.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device equipped with a camera, sensing unit, and processor that determines the time required for the vehicle to reach a manual driving mode point and the driver's readiness time, outputting notification to shorten the driver's preparation time when necessary, and adjusting vehicle speed or mode switching based on these comparisons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the vehicle switches to manual driving mode at the predetermined point, then the autonomous driving control can be completed on time, but the driver may not be ready to take control, creating a safety risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching response timeVSAvoiddriver readiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by notifying the driver in advance before the mode switching point is reached. The notification is sent at a calculated time that accounts for the driver's response characteristics, ensuring the driver is mentally prepared to take control before the actual switching occurs at the predetermined point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The notification timing is dynamically adjusted based on the driver's individual response characteristics. The system measures the driver's response time to notifications and uses this information to calculate the optimal notification timing, making the system adaptive to different drivers rather than using a fixed notification interval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the driver's response time is measured and notification timing is adjusted, then driver readiness is improved, but the system complexity increases due to additional sensing and calculation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver readinessVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the driver's own response to notifications as the measurement input. When the notification unit sends a notification and the driver responds (e.g., by pressing a button or making a sound), the system automatically measures the response time and uses it to calculate subsequent notification timings, eliminating the need for separate measurement devices or complex assessment protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the driver's response time to notifications is measured and fed back into the calculation of future notification timings. This closed-loop approach continuously optimizes the notification timing based on actual driver performance, improving readiness while keeping the system adaptable to individual drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple notifications are sent to ensure driver readiness, then the driver preparation time is sufficient, but the loss of time for the switching process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver readinessVSAvoidnotification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the timing parameter of notifications based on measured driver response characteristics. Instead of sending notifications at fixed intervals or a fixed number of times, the system calculates the optimal notification timing using the driver's measured response time, thereby minimizing the total notification duration while ensuring the driver is adequately prepared.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10684620B2Vehicle control device mounted on vehicle and method for controlling the vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US10684620B2 patent drawing
  • US10684620B2 patent drawing
  • US10684620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a vehicle control device provided in a vehicle and a method of controlling the vehicle. A vehicle control device according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a sensing unit configured to sense a driver's state, and a processor configured to decide a first time required for a vehicle currently traveling in an autonomous driving mode to reach a point where the vehicle is to be switched to a manual driving mode, and decide a second time required for the driver to be ready to perform manual driving based on the driver's state, wherein the processor outputs notification information such that the second time is shortened when the second time is longer than the first time.