Vehicle Control Device for Automated Driving Handover Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems that transition from automated driving to manual driving based on a predetermined time period often shorten the automated driving period, leading to inefficient handover processes.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device that adjusts the notification timing for a driving takeover request based on the present or scheduled travel speed, allowing for either a distance-based or time-based notification, ensuring a smooth transition from automated to manual driving.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If notification timing is determined by a predetermined time period only, then the handover process is simplified, but the automated driving period is shortened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover process simplicityVSAvoidautomated driving period
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The notification timing determination is made dynamic by selecting between distance-based and time-based criteria according to the current travel speed. When travel speed exceeds a predetermined threshold, time-based notification is used; otherwise, distance-based notification is used. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize both the simplicity of handover and the duration of automated driving based on real-time operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The notification timing criterion is changed based on the travel speed parameter. The system switches between two different determination criteria (distance-based vs. time-based) depending on whether the travel speed exceeds a threshold value. This parameter-driven selection enables the system to maintain automated driving for longer periods while ensuring smooth handover when conditions require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of moving object

If notification timing is adjusted based on travel speed with multiple criteria, then the automated driving period is extended, but the control logic becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated driving periodVSAvoidcontrol logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The notification timing determination is segmented into two distinct criteria: distance-based notification and time-based notification. Each criterion is applied in specific scenarios based on travel speed. This segmentation allows the system to handle different driving conditions with appropriate simplicity, avoiding the need for a single complex determination mechanism while still achieving extended automated driving periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control logic dynamically selects between two relatively simple determination criteria based on a single threshold comparison of travel speed. This dynamic selection approach avoids creating a single complex decision-making system, instead using two simple criteria that are appropriately applied based on real-time speed conditions, thereby managing complexity effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the time period until changeover switch operation is extended, then the handover can be smoother, but the vehicle may need to decelerate and stop on the roadside

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover smoothnessVSAvoidvehicle speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The notification timing parameter is changed based on travel speed to optimize the balance between handover smoothness and vehicle speed maintenance. By using distance-based notification at lower speeds and time-based notification at higher speeds, the system ensures adequate notification time for smooth handover while minimizing unnecessary deceleration and stopping events that would disrupt normal driving flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10994750B2Vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2021.05.04 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10994750B2 patent drawing
  • US10994750B2 patent drawing
  • US10994750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device is provided with a timing selection unit configured to select, during automated driving, either one of a first notification timing at which notification of a driving takeover request is issued in the case that a remaining distance to a scheduled switching point from the automated driving to manual driving has become less than or equal to a predetermined distance, and a second notification timing at which notification of the driving takeover request is issued in the case that a remaining time period until reaching the scheduled switching point is less than or equal to a predetermined time period, wherein the timing selection unit selects the first notification timing or the second notification timing based on a present travel speed or a scheduled travel speed.