Vehicle Control Device Tilt Threshold Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control devices struggle to accurately prevent rolling backwards on inclined road surfaces during automatic engine stop and restart, as they fail to precisely detect road gradients, leading to insufficient suppression of rolling and increased fuel consumption.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device that includes means for detecting vehicle tilt and forcibly restarting the engine when the tilt exceeds a predetermined value during deceleration, allowing for automatic stopping during relatively relaxed conditions on inclined surfaces while preventing rolling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automatic stopping of the engine is prohibited during deceleration on roads with large upward gradients, then rolling backwards of the vehicle is prevented, but fuel consumption increases and mileage deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the tilt determination value parameter based on vehicle operating conditions. During deceleration, a first (lower) determination value is used, allowing automatic stopping on mild gradients. During acceleration or at other times, a second (higher) determination value is used, preventing stopping on steeper gradients. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by enabling fuel-saving automatic stops when safe and preventing rolling backwards when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the automatic stopping process is strictly limited during deceleration, then rolling backwards is suppressed, but the frequency of automatic stopping is reduced and fuel consumption is not sufficiently suppressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuppression of rolling backwardsVSAvoidfrequency of automatic stopping
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the tilt threshold parameter based on the vehicle's acceleration state. During deceleration, a lower threshold (first determination value) is applied, permitting automatic stopping more frequently. During acceleration or normal operation, a higher threshold (second determination value) is applied, restricting automatic stopping to prevent rolling backwards. This resolves the contradiction by adapting the stopping criteria to match the vehicle's dynamic state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the automatic stopping permission based on real-time detection of acceleration or deceleration states. The tilt determination value is not fixed but changes according to the vehicle's motion state, enabling the system to be more permissive during deceleration (allowing frequent stops) and more restrictive during acceleration (preventing rolling backwards).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If the tilt determination value is set high to allow automatic stopping during deceleration, then fuel consumption is reduced, but rolling backwards occurs on gradient road surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidsuppression of rolling backwards
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses two different tilt determination values: a first (lower) value during deceleration that allows automatic stopping on mild gradients, and a second (higher) value during acceleration or other states that prevents stopping on steeper gradients. This dual-parameter approach resolves the contradiction by matching the threshold to the vehicle's operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If the detected tilt value is corrected based on acceleration, then precision of gradient detection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of gradient detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex continuous correction calculations with a simpler conditional approach. Instead of continuously correcting tilt values based on acceleration data, the system detects acceleration states and selects from two predetermined tilt determination values. This substitution of a complex correction mechanism with a simpler conditional selection process maintains measurement precision while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures frequent automatic engine stopping during deceleration while effectively suppressing rolling backwards on gradient surfaces, maintaining vehicle stability and reducing fuel consumption.

Implementation Method 1

means for detecting a tilt, which detects a tilt value indicative of a tilt of the vehicle in a longitudinal direction thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2570651B1Vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2019.10.02 MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP
  • EP2570651B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2570651B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2570651B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention provides a vehicle control device having an advantage of ensuring frequency of automatic stopping of an engine during deceleration of a vehicle while suppressing reliably rolling backwards of the vehicle even if a road surface has a gradient. The means for controlling automatic stopping 22C performs an automatic stopping process of an engine 10 when a stop condition during stopping is established in a stopping state of a vehicle, or when a stop condition during deceleration is established in a decelerating state of the vehicle. The means for controlling automatic restart 22D performs an automatic restart process of the engine 10 when a restart condition is established in a state where the engine 10 is in the automatic stopping process. The tilt sensor 38 detects a tilt value θ indicative of a tilt of the vehicle in a longitudinal direction thereof. The means for forced restarting 22E forcibly performs the automatic restart process in a state where the tilt value θ is greater than a determining tilt value θc for the decelerating state when the vehicle is in a stopping state or a low speed state just before the stopping state following the performing of the automatic stopping process, in the decelerating state of the vehicle.