Vehicle Control System Using Dynamic Object Verification for Traffic Light Reliability
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing vehicle control systems that determine the lighting state of traffic lights based solely on captured images may incorrectly determine the lighting state due to noise from other light sources, leading to potential safety hazards when controlling host vehicles.
Innovation Solution
A vehicle control system that includes a lighting state determination unit to determine the lighting state of traffic lights and calculate their reliability, a dynamic object recognition unit to recognize dynamic objects around the host vehicle, and a lighting state evaluation unit to update the reliability of the lighting state based on the behavior of dynamic objects.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If the lighting state of a traffic light is determined based solely on captured images, then the determination process is simple and quick, but the accuracy and reliability of the determination deteriorate when noise from other light sources is present
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces dynamic objects (other vehicles and pedestrians) as intermediary elements to verify the lighting state determination. Instead of directly trusting the image-based determination, the system uses the behaviors of these dynamic objects as intermediate verification - if their behaviors are consistent with the determined lighting state, then the determination is considered reliable. This intermediary verification mechanism resolves the contradiction by adding a validation layer without significantly complicating the core determination process.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback by observing whether dynamic objects behave consistently with the determined lighting state. The behavior of dynamic objects serves as feedback information to validate or refute the initial determination. If the feedback indicates inconsistency (e.g., vehicles moving when red light is detected), the system can correct or reject the erroneous determination, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining efficient operation.
2Ease of operation
If the lighting state determination is performed without verifying with dynamic object behaviors, then the system operation is simple and fast, but the reliability and safety of vehicle control deteriorate due to possible erroneous determinations
Solution Approach 1:
Dynamic objects serve as intermediary verification elements that provide indirect validation of the lighting state determination. The system does not directly measure the lighting state with absolute certainty but uses the behaviors of dynamic objects as intermediate evidence. This approach maintains operational simplicity while significantly improving reliability, as the intermediary verification catches erroneous determinations without requiring complex direct measurement improvements.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary verification by checking whether dynamic object behaviors are consistent with the determined lighting state before finalizing the control decision. This preliminary action using readily observable dynamic object behaviors provides a quick reliability check that maintains fast operation while ensuring safety, avoiding the need for complex verification procedures.
3Device complexity
If only captured images are used for traffic light detection, then the device complexity is low, but the determination reliability deteriorates in noisy environments with other light sources
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses dynamic objects as intermediary verification elements that require no additional detection devices. Instead of adding complex verification hardware, the system leverages the naturally occurring dynamic objects in the environment as mediators to validate the image-based determination. This approach maintains low device complexity while improving determination accuracy through intelligent use of existing environmental elements.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs self-verification by using the behaviors of dynamic objects that are already present in the environment. Rather than requiring additional active sensors or verification devices, the system extracts verification information from the self-moving dynamic objects that naturally exist in the traffic scene. This self-service approach improves reliability without increasing device complexity.
Data Source
AI summary
Provided is a vehicle control system which prevents a host vehicle from being controlled by executing a driving support function based on an erroneous lighting state in a case where the lighting state of a traffic light is erroneously determined. The vehicle control system includes: a lighting state determination unit 123 which determines a lighting state of a traffic light placed on a road on which a host vehicle travels, and calculates reliability of the determined lighting state of the traffic light, a dynamic object recognition unit 122 which recognizes information regarding a dynamic object existing around the host vehicle (behavior of another vehicle, a pedestrian, or the like), and a lighting state evaluation unit 131 which updates the reliability of the lighting state calculated by the lighting state determination unit 123 based on the information recognized by the dynamic object recognition unit 122 (information regarding the dynamic object existing around the host vehicle).


