Vehicle Control Handover Between Local Drivers and Teleoperators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The transfer of control between local operators and remote operators of road vehicles must be executed precisely to ensure safe operation, as existing technologies lack effective methods for seamless transitions and real-time monitoring of vehicle states and operator performance.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows drivers to request control transfer to teleoperators, with a pool of teleoperators selected based on experience and suitability, using wireless communication networks for bi-directional data transmission, including imaging and drive state information, and real-time monitoring to ensure safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If control is transferred from local operator to remote teleoperator, then vehicle safety is improved by reducing operator fatigue and errors, but system complexity increases due to need for communication networks and coordination protocols

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A server acts as an intermediary between the vehicle and teleoperator stations, managing control transfers and coordinating communication. The server receives requests from either local operators or teleoperators, processes the transfer protocol, and ensures safe handover of vehicle control, thereby reducing direct system complexity while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional components: local operator controls, remote teleoperator stations, and a central server. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently with well-defined interfaces, improving reliability through modular design while managing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If real-time monitoring and data transmission are implemented, then operator performance and vehicle state are better monitored for safety, but information loss and communication delays may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle state monitoringVSAvoiddata transmission accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements bidirectional feedback loops where the vehicle continuously transmits state data (position, speed, sensor information) to the server, and the server provides feedback commands to both local operators and teleoperators. This ensures real-time monitoring while maintaining data accuracy through continuous verification and correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing communication channels and data transmission protocols before control transfer occurs. Vehicle state data is continuously buffered and validated in advance, ensuring that no critical information is lost during the transition period

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If control transfer protocol is simplified, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability may be compromised due to insufficient safety checks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol transfer simplicityVSAvoidcontrol transfer safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary safety checks and validations before executing control transfer. The server verifies vehicle state, operator credentials, and environmental conditions in advance, then presents a simplified interface to operators for final confirmation, balancing simplicity with thorough safety verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control transfer system automatically manages many safety checks and coordination tasks without requiring manual intervention from operators. The server autonomously verifies conditions, coordinates with relevant parties, and executes the transfer protocol, simplifying the operator's role while maintaining high reliability through automated safety mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250021091A1Transferring control of vehicles between local operators and remote teleoperators
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 VAY TECH GMBH
  • US20250021091A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021091A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021091A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle is configured for local operation by an on-board human operator or remote operation by a remote human operator (or teleoperator) via a computer system in communication with the vehicle. A local human operator may request that a remote human operator take operational control of the vehicle, and a bi-directional communication channel between the computer system and the vehicle is established. The remote human operator is selected based on a drive state of the vehicle, any attributes of the local human operator or the remote human operator. When the vehicle violates one or more standards under operational control of the local human operator, transfer of the operational control is recommended to the local human operator. When the vehicle violates one or more standards under the operational control of a remote human operator, the operational control of the vehicle is transferred to another remote human operator.