Vehicle Control Apparatus Knocking Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to effectively suppress knocking and reduce carbon monoxide emissions when operating at theoretical air-fuel ratios across all engine regions, leading to increased exhaust CO levels and potential engine damage.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus and method that includes a supercharger, spark plug, variable valve apparatus, and controller, which adjust ignition timing and intake valve closing timing based on engine operating regions to prevent knocking, while maintaining theoretical air-fuel ratios, by retarding ignition timing, advancing intake valve closing, and increasing supercharging pressure as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rich burn is performed to suppress knocking in high load region, then knocking margin is secured and exhaust temperature is reduced, but carbon monoxide emission is increased excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknocking suppressionVSAvoidcarbon monoxide emission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the air-fuel ratio parameter based on engine operating conditions. In high load regions, it transitions from theoretical air-fuel ratio to rich burn to suppress knocking, while in low load regions it maintains theoretical air-fuel ratio to minimize CO emissions. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction between knocking suppression and CO emission reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The air-fuel ratio is made dynamic rather than fixed, allowing the engine control system to adjust between theoretical and rich burn modes based on real-time operating conditions. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to optimize both knocking suppression and emission control across different operating regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-generated harmful factors

If theoretical air-fuel ratio is used in all operating regions, then carbon monoxide emission is reduced, but knocking cannot be suppressed in high load region

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon monoxide emissionVSAvoidknocking suppression
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the air-fuel ratio parameter from fixed theoretical ratio to a variable ratio that becomes richer in high load regions. This parameter transformation allows the system to maintain low CO emissions in most operating regions while enabling knocking suppression when needed in high load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If rich burn is performed to reduce exhaust temperature and prevent engine damage, then engine output is increased, but carbon monoxide exhaust amount is increased excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine outputVSAvoidcarbon monoxide exhaust
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The air-fuel ratio parameter is adjusted dynamically based on load conditions. Rich burn is applied selectively in high load regions where it provides the benefits of reduced exhaust temperature and increased engine output, while theoretical air-fuel ratio is maintained in lower load regions to minimize CO emissions. This conditional parameter change resolves the contradiction between power enhancement and emission control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively suppresses knocking and reduces carbon monoxide emissions by dynamically adjusting engine parameters, ensuring efficient combustion and minimizing exhaust CO levels across all engine operating regions.

Implementation Method 1

a supercharger configured to supply compressed air to a the combustion chamber of the engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

an spark plug configured to ignite mixed air supplied to the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical discharge: Electric Spark

Implementation Method 3

a variable valve apparatus configured to adjust an opening timing and closing timing of the intake valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValve timing control: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS11536207B2Apparatus of controlling vehicle and method thereof
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 KIA CORPORATION
  • US11536207B2 patent drawing
  • US11536207B2 patent drawing
  • US11536207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus of controlling a vehicle and a method thereof are provided. The operating region of an engine is operated with theoretical air-fuel ratio. The apparatus includes a supercharger that supplies compressed air to a the combustion chamber of the engine and a spark plug that ignites mixed air supplied to the combustion chamber. An intake valve selectively opens and closes the combustion chamber for inflowing the mixed air therein. A variable valve apparatus adjusts an opening timing and closing timing of the intake valve and a controller adjusts an ignition timing of the spark plug and the closing timing of the intake valve through the variable valve apparatus based on the operating region of the engine.