Vehicle Combination Control Limits for Rollover and Jack-Knife Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of coordinating and maneuvering multiple vehicle units in multi-unit vehicle combinations poses challenges in ensuring safe and precise control, particularly due to complex interactions and dynamic behaviors.

Innovation Solution

A system that acquires longitudinal velocity of the vehicle combination and determines upper and lower limits for control parameters for each unit, enabling unit-level control, which allows for enhanced control such as stretch braking and roll-over prevention, and considers different side slip angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If unit-level control with different limits for different units is implemented, then control precision and safety are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent control units, each managing a specific vehicle unit (tractor, trailer, etc.). Each unit receives customized control limits based on its individual characteristics, enabling precise control without requiring a monolithic complex control system. The segmentation allows parallel processing and reduces the computational burden on a single controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different control limits and parameters are applied to different vehicle units based on their local characteristics (mass, dimensions, braking capability, etc.). The tractor unit may have different longitudinal velocity limits compared to trailer units, and each unit's control parameter is optimized for its specific operational requirements, achieving high precision control through localized parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If different control limits are set for different units, then safety and stability are improved, but control coordination difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle combination safetyVSAvoidcontrol coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control limits for each unit are made dynamic rather than static. The processing circuitry continuously adjusts the control parameters based on real-time operational conditions, including the longitudinal velocity of the vehicle combination, current load conditions, and environmental factors. This dynamic adjustment enables automatic coordination between units without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where each control unit monitors its own performance and the performance of adjacent units. The processing circuitry receives data from all units, processes this information centrally, and sends updated control limits back to individual units. This feedback mechanism ensures coordinated operation while maintaining the flexibility of unit-specific control parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250360804A1Control limits for vehicle combination units
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • US20250360804A1 patent drawing
  • US20250360804A1 patent drawing
  • US20250360804A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system has processing circuitry to acquire a longitudinal velocity of a vehicle combination comprising a tractor unit and at least one trailing unit; and determine an upper limit and/or a lower limit for a control parameter for at least one unit of the vehicle combination based on the acquired longitudinal velocity; and transmit the upper and/or lower limit to a controller of the at least one unit of the vehicle combination.