Remote Vehicle Control Arbitration Using Surrounding-Object Permission Levels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In scenarios where multiple applications remotely control vehicles, there is a risk of interference between vehicle control requests, which can lead to suboptimal control of the vehicle, compromising safety and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device that acquires and arbitrates vehicle control requests from multiple applications, assigning a permission level based on the vehicle's surroundings, determining interference, and correcting for driver characteristics to ensure safe and efficient execution of control instructions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple vehicle control requests from different applications are individually instructed to the vehicle, then each application can provide its service, but interference between vehicle controls occurs leading to suboptimal control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice provision capabilityVSAvoidcontrol safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote control management device as an intermediary between multiple applications and the vehicle. This mediator receives control requests from multiple applications, performs arbitration to determine execution order and compatibility, and then transmits the arbitrated requests to the vehicle. This resolves the contradiction by enabling multiple services while preventing harmful interference through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary arbitration of control requests before they are executed on the vehicle. The remote control management device evaluates multiple requests in advance, determines their compatibility and execution order, and only then transmits the arbitrated requests to the vehicle. This preliminary action prevents interference from occurring in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If multiple vehicle control requests are transmitted simultaneously to the vehicle, then service response time is reduced, but control interference and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice response timeVSAvoidcontrol interference
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The remote control management device serves as a mediator that receives multiple control requests simultaneously, evaluates their compatibility and urgency, determines the optimal execution order, and then transmits them to the vehicle in a safe sequence. This maintains fast response while preventing harmful interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of request transmission from simultaneous to sequential based on arbitration results. The management device assigns different transmission timings and priorities to different requests based on their compatibility and urgency, optimizing both response time and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If arbitration of vehicle control requests is implemented, then control safety and optimality are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol safetyVSAvoidarbitration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The remote control management device performs multiple functions: receiving requests from multiple applications, evaluating compatibility, determining execution order, and transmitting arbitrated requests to the vehicle. By consolidating these functions in a single multi-functional device, the patent avoids the need for multiple separate arbitration systems, thereby reducing overall complexity while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If control requests are individually processed without arbitration, then system complexity is reduced, but control optimality and safety deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcontrol efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The remote control management device acts as an efficient intermediary that streamlines the control request processing. Instead of complex individual processing for each request, the mediator provides centralized arbitration that optimizes the execution order and compatibility of multiple requests, improving control efficiency without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240203257A1Information processing device
Publication Date: 2024.06.20 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20240203257A1 patent drawing
  • US20240203257A1 patent drawing
  • US20240203257A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device for remotely controlling a vehicle, the information processing device comprising: an acquisition unit that acquires a plurality of requests related to control of a target vehicle from a plurality of applications; a processing unit that arbitrates the plurality of requests acquired by the acquisition unit; and a communication unit that transmits an instruction for control based on a result of arbitration by the processing unit to the target vehicle, wherein the processing unit assigns a level indicating a percentage of permission to each of the plurality of requests based on a range set according to a surrounding object that is an object existing in the vicinity of the target vehicle, and arbitrates the plurality of requests based on the level.