Vehicle Control Apparatus Using Relative Speed and Distance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle control systems face challenges in precisely controlling vehicle behavior due to reliance on calculated traveling speed based on distance to a front vehicle, leading to potential inaccuracies in speed adjustment and lane changes.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus that specifies the speed of objects in front of the vehicle and calculates a target speed based on the object's speed, distance, and relative speed, using weight coefficients to adjust for differences and safety, allowing for precise control of the vehicle's trajectory and lane changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traveling speed is calculated based on distance to front vehicle, then vehicle control can be implemented, but control precision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed measurement precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the actual traveling speed of the own vehicle and comparing it with the target speed calculated from object speed and distance. The calculation unit adjusts the target speed based on the difference between actual and target speed, creating a closed-loop control system that improves speed measurement precision and control accuracy without requiring complex additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical speed sensing with a calculation-based approach. Instead of relying solely on mechanical speed sensors, the system calculates target speed using the formula: target speed = object speed + (distance difference × weight coefficient), substituting mechanical measurement with computational methods to achieve higher precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If target speed is calculated using multiple parameters (speed, distance, relative speed), then control precision improves, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget speed calculation precisionVSAvoidcalculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by incorporating multiple variables (object speed, distance to object, relative speed) into the target speed calculation. The calculation unit uses the comprehensive formula that considers all these parameters simultaneously, allowing precise control of vehicle behavior by adjusting target speed based on the combined effect of multiple changing parameters rather than relying on a single parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the speed control function into distinct calculation components: object speed detection, distance measurement, relative speed calculation, and target speed synthesis. Each component is handled by specific units (specification unit, calculation unit), dividing the complex calculation task into manageable segments that can be processed independently and then integrated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If vehicle control adjusts speed based on multiple objects, then safety improves, but control response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control safetyVSAvoidcontrol response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the calculation unit to automatically prioritize and process multiple objects independently. Each object's target speed is calculated separately based on its own parameters (speed, distance, relative speed), and the system autonomously determines the lowest target speed without requiring external intervention or complex sequential processing, thus maintaining safety while reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by calculating target speeds for multiple objects but implementing control based on the lowest target speed only. This selective approach processes information for all detected objects (excessive calculation) but applies control action only for the most critical case (partial control), ensuring safety by considering all objects while maintaining fast response time by acting on the single most restrictive constraint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10017180B2Vehicle control apparatus, vehicle control method, and vehicle control program
Publication Date: 2018.07.10 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10017180B2 patent drawing
  • US10017180B2 patent drawing
  • US10017180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control apparatus includes a specification unit configured to specify a speed of an object located in front of an own vehicle and a distance between the object and the own vehicle, a calculation unit configured to calculate a target speed of the own vehicle on the basis of the speed of the object specified by the specification unit and a value based on the distance, and a traveling control unit configured to control traveling of the own vehicle on the basis of the target speed calculated by the calculation unit.