Vehicle Control Apparatus Risk Potential Grid Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to select an avoidance route with a low degree of risk, as they simply calculate the minimum risk position without considering the overall risk distribution around the vehicle.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus that detects surrounding objects, divides the road area into sections, sets potentials for each section based on detected objects, calculates an index value considering both section potentials and foreseen information, and selects sections along the vehicle's path to determine a safer route.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system simply calculates the minimum degree of risk for each position, then the calculation process is simple and fast, but the selected position may have low local risk while surrounding areas have high risk, resulting in an unsafe avoidance route

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of avoidance routeVSAvoidcomplexity of risk evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the road area into multiple divided areas (grids) and further segments the risk evaluation into local degree of risk (for each divided area) and overall degree of risk (considering surrounding areas). This segmentation allows the system to evaluate both local and surrounding risk independently, resolving the contradiction by enabling comprehensive safety assessment without requiring a completely complex monolithic evaluation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of evaluation by considering not only the current divided area but also surrounding divided areas in the risk assessment. By adding this spatial dimension (surrounding areas) to the traditional single-point risk evaluation, the system achieves more reliable route selection while maintaining a structured approach that doesn't excessively increase complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the system evaluates only the current divided area without considering surrounding areas, then the evaluation process is simple and fast, but the system cannot ensure that the selected position is entirely safe from surrounding risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive safety assessmentVSAvoidtime for risk evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation of surrounding divided areas by generating foreseen information about future risk states. This preliminary action allows the system to anticipate potential risks in surrounding areas before the vehicle reaches them, enabling comprehensive safety assessment without requiring real-time analysis of all surrounding areas, thus reducing evaluation time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent evaluates only certain surrounding divided areas (those within a predetermined range or having significant impact) rather than all possible surrounding areas. This partial evaluation approach achieves comprehensive enough safety assessment while avoiding the excessive time consumption that would result from evaluating every possible surrounding area in detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the system uses a comprehensive risk evaluation considering surrounding areas, then the avoidance route selection is more accurate and safe, but the calculation complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of route selectionVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive risk evaluation into two distinct components: local degree of risk (for the current divided area) and overall degree of risk (for surrounding areas). This segmentation allows the system to maintain high measurement precision by considering both local and surrounding factors, while managing complexity through a modular structure where each component can be calculated independently and then combined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds the dimension of surrounding area evaluation to the traditional single-point risk assessment. By introducing this additional spatial dimension, the system achieves more precise route selection that considers both immediate and future risks, while the structured approach to evaluating surrounding areas prevents excessive complexity from overwhelming the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10860028B2Vehicle control apparatus, vehicle control method, and program
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10860028B2 patent drawing
  • US10860028B2 patent drawing
  • US10860028B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control apparatus includes a detecting unit that detects an surrounding object around a vehicle; a first setting unit that sets a first potential for multiple divided areas resulting from division of a road area based on the road area; a second setting unit that sets a second potential for the divided areas based on the detected surrounding object; an evaluating unit that calculates an index value by evaluating a potential of a target divided area based on the first potential and the second potential set for the target divided area in the multiple divided areas and foreseen information generated for surrounding divided areas selected from a periphery of the target divided area; and a selecting unit that selects one or more divided areas along a moving direction of the vehicle from the multiple divided areas based on the calculated index value.