Human-Powered Vehicle Control Using Real-Time Road Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing human-powered vehicles lack the ability to flexibly adapt their control systems to changing driving environments, such as road conditions and obstacles, which can impact safety and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A control device for human-powered vehicles equipped with an electronic controller that analyzes real-time images from a camera to obtain road object information and control electric components like braking, gear shifting, and rider posture adjustment based on detected environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time image analysis is implemented to detect road objects, then safety and adaptability are improved, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic controller serves multiple functions: it controls electric components (brakes, gears, posture adjustment) and simultaneously performs image analysis by integrating the camera functionality. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated processing units, thereby improving safety through comprehensive monitoring while limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vehicle's existing electronic controller to process camera images and control electric components, rather than adding separate dedicated hardware for each function. The controller serves itself by handling both control and detection tasks, which improves reliability while minimizing additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If real-time image analysis is implemented to detect road objects, then safety and adaptability are improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic controller that already consumes energy for controlling electric components is utilized to perform image analysis as well. By making the controller serve dual purposes, the patent avoids adding separate power-intensive processing units, thereby improving safety while limiting the increase in overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic controller is designed to perform multiple functions including controlling brakes, gears, posture adjustment, and analyzing camera images. This multi-functionality allows the system to improve safety through real-time monitoring without proportionally increasing energy consumption, as the same processor handles multiple tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple electric components are controlled based on driving-environment information, then adaptability and ease of operation are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic controller is designed to control multiple electric components (brakes, gear-shifting device, rider-posture adjusting device) from a single unit. This centralized control approach improves adaptability by allowing coordinated adjustment of multiple systems based on driving conditions, while avoiding the complexity of multiple independent control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the control of brakes, gear-shifting, and rider-posture adjustment into a single electronic controller that receives driving-environment information and coordinates all electric components. This merging of control functions improves adaptability while managing device complexity through integration rather than multiplication of control units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250269922A1Control device for human-powered vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 SHIMANO INC
  • US20250269922A1 patent drawing
  • US20250269922A1 patent drawing
  • US20250269922A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control device for a human-powered vehicle includes an electronic controller and a detector. The electronic controller is configured to obtain driving-environment information relating to driving environment of the human-powered vehicle. The driving-environment information includes road object information relating to road objects. The electronic controller is configured to control an electric component based on the driving-environment information. The electronic controller is configured to obtain the driving-environment information based on a detection result of the detector. The detector includes a camera configured to capture a real-time image of at least one of a forward view, a rearward view, a right view, and a left view of the human-powered vehicle. The electronic controller is configured to receive the real-time image from the camera. The electronic controller is configured to analyze the real-time image to obtain the road object information relating to the road objects around the human-powered vehicle.