Vehicle Control Device Speed Distribution Area

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems face inefficiencies in safe driving assistance due to the complexity of prioritizing multiple request signals for brake and steering controls, which can lead to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system that detects external objects, determines speed distribution areas based on relative speed limits, and adjusts vehicle speed and steering to maintain allowable upper limits, ensuring safe passage by integrating brake and steering assist controls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If one request signal is prioritized over others in multiple safe driving assist systems, then the control decision can be made simply, but the safe driving assist system may not function efficiently as a whole due to system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol decision complexityVSAvoidsafe driving assistance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple request signals from different safe driving assist systems into a unified control framework. By integrating brake request signals and steering request signals into a single coordinated control system, it resolves the contradiction by merging previously separate control decisions into a unified efficient system that considers all objects and requests simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system achieves multi-functionality by handling multiple types of request signals (brake, steering) from multiple safe driving assist systems through a single universal control mechanism. This universal controller can process different signal types and coordinate them efficiently, improving overall system efficiency without increasing decision complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the allowable upper limit of relative speed is made lower as distance from object becomes smaller, then collision avoidance is improved, but the vehicle speed control becomes more restrictive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidvehicle speed control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by setting different allowable upper limits of relative speed for different spatial zones around the vehicle. Instead of a uniform speed limit, the system creates a speed distribution area where the permissible speed varies locally based on distance to objects, with lower limits closer to objects and higher limits farther away, optimizing both safety and control flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the allowable upper limit of relative speed based on real-time distance measurements to objects. As the vehicle approaches or recedes from objects, the speed limits are dynamically modified, allowing the vehicle to maintain higher speeds when safe and reduce speeds when necessary, thus balancing collision avoidance with speed control flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If speed distribution areas are determined for multiple detected objects, then comprehensive safety coverage is achieved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverage completenessVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the spatial environment into multiple speed distribution areas, each associated with a detected object. By dividing the control space into distinct zones around each object with its own speed limits, the system achieves comprehensive safety coverage while managing complexity through modular spatial segmentation rather than monolithic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3418151B1Vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2023.04.19 MAZDA MOTOR CORP
  • EP3418151B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3418151B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3418151B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4A

AI summary

ECU 10 is configured to detect an object external to the vehicle 1, and determine a speed distribution area 40 for defining a distribution of an allowable upper limit of a relative speed of the vehicle 1 with respect to the object in a travelling direction, in a range from a lateral area to rearward and forward areas of the object in the travelling direction. The speed distribution area is determined such that the allowable upper limit is made lower as a lateral distance and a longitudinal distance from the object become smaller. When objects (8A, 8B) are detected, respective ones of the speed distribution areas (40A, 40B) for respective ones of the objects are set, the relative speed for each of objects is calculated, and an avoidance control is executed for restricting the relative speed from exceeding the allowable upper limits.