Vehicle Control Unified Object Boundary for Interference Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to provide a fine-granularity prediction of interference potential between multiple objects and a vehicle, as they rely on representative evaluation values without considering positional relationships between objects.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus that forms unified objects based on positional relationships between detected objects within a predetermined distance range, using geometric shapes like polygons to predict interference potential, thereby accounting for the geometry of the vehicle and detection performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If representative evaluation values (TTC) are used for grouped objects, then the frequency of alarm activation is decreased and driver annoyance is reduced, but the granularity of prediction regarding interference potential is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of grouping objectsVSAvoidgranularity of interference potential prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the interference potential prediction by introducing a unified object boundary that divides the spatial relationship between grouped objects and the vehicle. Instead of treating all grouped objects uniformly, the boundary creates distinct regions (inside/outside the boundary) that enable differentiated prediction of interference potential for each object relative to the vehicle's geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a spatial dimension to the prediction by introducing the unified object boundary concept. This boundary creates a new spatial reference frame that allows the system to evaluate not just the representative TTC value, but also the positional relationship of each object to the vehicle through the boundary structure, thereby enhancing prediction granularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If fine-granularity prediction is performed for each object, then the accuracy of interference potential prediction is improved, but the computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegranularity of interference potential predictionVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the evaluation of multiple grouped objects into a unified prediction framework. By introducing the unified object boundary, the system can evaluate the interference potential of multiple objects simultaneously through a single boundary-based assessment, rather than performing separate detailed evaluations for each object, thus reducing overall computation time while maintaining fine-granularity prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the unified object boundary as a simplified geometric representation that copies the essential spatial relationship information without requiring complex individual object models. This boundary acts as a computational proxy that preserves the necessary positional relationship data while significantly reducing the computational complexity of interference potential prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If the boundary is determined without considering vehicle geometry, then the computation is simpler, but the accuracy of determining whether the vehicle can pass through clearances between objects is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation simplicityVSAvoidaccuracy of clearance determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adapting the unified object boundary determination to the specific geometry of the vehicle. The boundary is not a generic geometric shape but is determined based on the vehicle's actual dimensions and shape characteristics, allowing the prediction system to account for local geometric features that affect clearance determination while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11027728B2Vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11027728B2 patent drawing
  • US11027728B2 patent drawing
  • US11027728B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated object formation unit of a vehicle control device forms integrated objects, which are integral objects, the boundaries of the integrated objects being determined from the positional relationship between two or ore objects in a prescribed distance range. An interference prediction unit of the vehicle control device predicts the probability of the integrated objects, instead of each of the objects, coming into contact with, or near, a vehicle.