Vehicle Control Apparatus for Reducing False Warnings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional driver drowsiness and fatigue sensing systems face limitations in efficiently improving warning operations, reducing false warning rates, and effectively preventing traffic accidents by timely warning of careless driving states.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus and method that includes an input unit for receiving lane and traffic sign information, a determination unit to assess driving patterns and driver behavior, and a controller to transmit warning commands and adjust vehicle control systems, such as speed regulation and electronic stability control, based on calculated carelessness state determination times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional driver drowsiness and fatigue sensing systems are used, then driver state monitoring is provided, but false warning rates are high and warning timing is improper

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning operation reliabilityVSAvoiddriver carelessness state detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the driver carelessness assessment into multiple independent evaluation dimensions: driving pattern analysis (lane keeping, steering behavior), driver behavior analysis (eye closure, head position, shoulder movement), and environmental context analysis (traffic signs, road conditions). Each dimension is evaluated separately and combined to make a comprehensive determination, reducing false warnings while improving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where warning history and driving pattern frequency are monitored over predetermined time periods. The carelessness state determination time is dynamically adjusted based on feedback from warning occurrence frequency and inappropriate driving pattern frequency, allowing the system to learn and adapt to reduce false warnings while maintaining proper warning timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If driver carelessness warning is activated, then driver safety is improved, but false warnings increase and proper timing is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic accident preventionVSAvoidfalse warning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of driving patterns and driver behavior before issuing warnings. It monitors and counts inappropriate driving patterns (lane deviations, steering behaviors) and driver carelessness indicators (eye closure duration, head position) over predetermined time periods, establishing a baseline and determining optimal warning timing in advance to avoid false warnings while ensuring timely alerts when truly needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the carelessness state determination time parameter based on multiple factors including inappropriate driving pattern frequency, warning occurrence frequency, and current driving conditions. This adaptive parameter adjustment allows the system to optimize warning timing for each specific situation, reducing false warnings while maintaining effective accident prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple driving parameters are monitored, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving pattern assessment precisionVSAvoidcontrol apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions within a single integrated system: it monitors driving patterns, analyzes driver behavior, determines carelessness states, calculates warning timing, and controls warning apparatus activation. By consolidating these functions into one multi-functional controller rather than separate systems, the patent achieves high detection precision while managing system complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10953893B2Vehicle control apparatus and vehicle control method
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 HL KLEMOVE CORP
  • US10953893B2 patent drawing
  • US10953893B2 patent drawing
  • US10953893B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a vehicle control apparatus and a vehicle control method. The vehicle control apparatus according to an embodiment of the present disclosure includes an input unit to receive current lane information, current traffic sign information, and current driver behavior information photographed by a photographing apparatus, a determination unit to determine whether a vehicle is in an inappropriate driving pattern based on the inputted current lane information and the current traffic sign information and to determine whether a driver is in a driver carelessness state based on the inputted current driver behavior information, and a controller to transmit a warning command to a warning apparatus so that the warning apparatus warns the driver that the driver is currently in a careless driving state if the vehicle is in the inappropriate driving pattern and the driver is in the driver carelessness state.