Vehicle Controller Abnormality Assessment for Autonomous Driving Continuity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems for autonomous driving face challenges in maintaining convenience when abnormalities occur in the shift control system, as they often require vehicles to move to a turnout place, potentially deteriorating the travel experience.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device that determines the propriety of autonomous driving travel based on the type of abnormality in the shift control system, allowing the vehicle to continue traveling to a target location even if abnormalities like failure in switching to a parking range or forward-backward switching occur, using redundant communication paths and predictive routing to ensure continued operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle stops at a turnout place when an abnormality occurs in the shift control system, then the safety is improved, but the convenience of autonomous driving travel deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidconvenience of autonomous driving travel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The controller changes the response parameter from binary (stop at turnout place or continue) to a graduated scale by identifying specific abnormality types (parking range switching failure, forward-backward switching failure, communication path failure) and matching them against continuation conditions. This parameter change enables differentiated responses: aborting only when necessary while continuing when safe, thereby improving convenience without compromising safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the autonomous driving travel is cancelled when an abnormality occurs in the shift control system, then the reliability is improved, but the productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of autonomous drivingVSAvoidexecution scenarios of autonomous driving travel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of abnormality types and evaluation of continuation conditions before making the decision to abort or continue autonomous driving travel. By预先 (in advance) establishing the criteria for continuation (target location reachability, shift range switchability, communication path redundancy), the system can quickly determine whether to maintain operation, thus improving productivity without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the decision parameter from a conservative binary state (abort on any abnormality) to a conditional state based on abnormality type and system capability. This enables the vehicle to maintain autonomous driving travel in scenarios where the abnormality does not prevent reaching the target location, thereby increasing execution scenarios and productivity while maintaining adequate reliability through targeted abort decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the vehicle requires moving to a turnout place when shift control system abnormality occurs, then the safety is improved, but the loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidtime for autonomous driving travel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the time parameter by eliminating unnecessary turnout place maneuvers through intelligent abnormality assessment. When the abnormality type and continuation conditions indicate that the vehicle can safely reach the target location, the system continues autonomous driving travel without requiring a time-consuming stop at a turnout place, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining safety through targeted abort decisions only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11485388B2Vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11485388B2 patent drawing
  • US11485388B2 patent drawing
  • US11485388B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device is applied to a vehicle including at least a shift control system configured to switch a shift range. The vehicle control device is configured to control the vehicle to perform autonomous driving travel without depending on an operation of a driver in at least one driving operation. The vehicle control device includes a controller. The controller is configured to determine the propriety of travel by the autonomous driving travel according to a type of abnormality that occurs in the shift control system. The controller is configured to perform travel control of the vehicle according to the propriety of the travel by the autonomous driving travel.