Distributed Vehicle Controller Backup for Failure-Tolerant Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In vehicles, the failure of a system controller can lead to impaired operation, especially if the failed system is vital, as there is no immediate way to redistribute control functions, resulting in potential operational disruptions until a mechanic can intervene.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a distributed control system where one system controller can take over the functions of another, allowing it to control its own system and one or more additional systems in case of failure, utilizing a central control system to manage the control bus and redirect control signals, enabling continued vehicle operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If each system has its own dedicated system controller, then the control function is simple and reliable under normal conditions, but the system reliability deteriorates when a controller fails because there is no backup control capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a distributed control system where each system controller is designed to perform multiple functions: controlling its own native system and potentially controlling other systems if their controllers fail. This multi-functionality ensures that control capabilities are preserved even when individual controllers fail, thereby improving system reliability without requiring dedicated backup controllers for each system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges control functions across multiple systems by enabling a single system controller to control multiple systems. When controllers are combined in this manner, the failure of one controller does not result in complete system failure, as other controllers can take over. This merging approach improves reliability while avoiding the complexity of having separate backup controllers for each system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If a system controller fails, then the vehicle operation is disrupted, but implementing a distributed control system allows continued operation by redistributing control functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle operation continuityVSAvoidcontrol management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic control redistribution mechanism where the control architecture can adapt in real-time based on controller status. When a controller fails, the system dynamically reassigns its control functions to other available controllers. This dynamic adaptation ensures continuous vehicle operation while the central control system manages the redistribution process, balancing reliability improvement with operational manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a central control system as an intermediary that manages the distributed control network. This intermediary coordinates control signal routing and manages the redistribution of control functions when failures occur. By having this mediating layer, the system achieves improved operation continuity while maintaining ease of management through centralized coordination rather than requiring complex peer-to-peer negotiation between controllers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If one system controller controls multiple systems, then control redundancy is improved, but the processing load on individual controllers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol redundancyVSAvoidcontroller processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a strategy where system controllers control their native systems plus some additional systems, but not all possible systems. Each controller takes on a manageable subset of additional control functions beyond its native system, providing redundancy without overwhelming the controller's processing capacity. This partial action approach balances reliability improvement with maintaining adequate processing power for each controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the control assignment parameters based on system conditions. When a controller's processing load becomes excessive, the system reconfigures which controllers manage which additional systems. This parameter change approach allows the system to maintain control redundancy while ensuring that no single controller becomes overloaded, thereby preserving both reliability and processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11907084B2Methods and apparatus for distributed control of vehicle systems
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 ATLIS MOTOR VEHICLES INC
  • US11907084B2 patent drawing
  • US11907084B2 patent drawing
  • US11907084B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a plurality of systems. Each system performs a function of the automobile. In an example embodiment, a plurality of system controllers, one for each system, controls the operation of the system. Each system controller controls how its corresponding system performs its function. When all system controllers are functional, a system controller generates control signals for its corresponding system. When one system controller ceased to operate, another system controller may control the system that corresponds to the failed system controller. Distributing control of systems among the various system controllers increases reliability.