Vehicle Feedback Controller Gain Tuning for Time Delays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional feedback-based vehicle systems struggle with time delays, leading to sub-optimal performance and potential instability, as they either ignore these delays or use simplistic approximations.

Innovation Solution

An iterative tuning system and method that utilizes a calibration system to simulate vehicle feedback systems with time delays, determining optimal gain values for controllers through an iterative process, evaluating a cost function to improve control performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional feedback-based control is used without considering time delays, then the control design is simple, but the system performance is sub-optimal and may become unstable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidcontrol design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing iterative tuning in a simulation environment before deploying the controller to the actual vehicle system. The calibration system pre-determines optimal gain values by simulating various time delay scenarios and evaluating cost functions, so that when the controller is deployed, it already has optimized parameters that account for anticipated time delays. This resolves the contradiction by preparing the control parameters in advance, ensuring stability without requiring complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating a simulation model that replicates the behavior of the actual vehicle feedback system, including its time delays. The calibration system operates on this copy (simulation model) rather than the real system, allowing extensive tuning and evaluation without risking actual vehicle stability. Once optimal gains are found in the simulation copy, they are transferred to the real controller. This approach enables thorough optimization while maintaining simple deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If time delays are accounted for in feedback-based control, then control performance is improved, but the tuning process becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol performanceVSAvoidtuning difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by implementing an iterative tuning process that continuously evaluates the control performance through a cost function and adjusts gain values accordingly. The calibration system runs simulations with different gain combinations, measures the resulting performance metrics (such as tracking error accumulation), and uses this feedback to refine the gains. This automated feedback loop makes the tuning process systematic rather than manual, resolving the contradiction by making performance improvement achievable through structured evaluation despite the presence of time delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the gain values adjustable and optimizing them for different operating conditions and time delay scenarios. Rather than using fixed gains, the system dynamically selects appropriate gain values based on the simulated performance across various conditions. The iterative process allows the controller parameters to adapt to different situations, improving overall control performance while managing the complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If simple approximations are used for time delays, then the control design is easier, but the system performance is sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol design easeVSAvoidcontrol performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the gain parameters (Kp, Ki, Kd) through iterative tuning to find optimal values that account for time delays. The calibration system changes these parameters across multiple simulation runs, evaluating each set against the cost function that reflects actual system performance. This allows the controller to achieve high reliability by using optimized parameters rather than simple approximations, while the automation maintains ease of design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12589759B2Iterative tuning techniques for vehicle feedback based systems with time delays
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 FCA US LLC
  • US12589759B2 patent drawing
  • US12589759B2 patent drawing
  • US12589759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An iterative tuning technique for a controller of a vehicle having a feedback based system includes obtaining, by a calibration system, a simulation model of operation of the controller and the feedback based system with a set of time delays, performing an iterative tuning process by running the simulation model to determine an optimal set of gains for the feedback based system for each of one or more sets of time delays and evaluating a cost function, and based on the cost function evaluating, determining the optimal set of gains for the feedback based system for the set of time delays, and uploading, by the calibration system to the controller, the one or more optimal sets of gains for the feedback based system for the one or more sets of time delays, respectively.