Vehicle Cooling System Common Equalizing Container

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle cooling systems require a large installation space and increased weight due to multiple dedicated equalizing containers for different cooling circuits, and their complex actuation and control systems to prevent heat transfer between circuits.

Innovation Solution

A cooling system where a first and second cooling circuit share a common equalizing container, with a passive element that separates the circuits based on pressure differences, eliminating the need for complex valve actuation and reducing the number of equalizing containers, and an active element maintains separation when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple dedicated equalizing containers are used for different cooling circuits, then each cooling circuit can be independently ventilated, but installation space and weight increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent ventilation of cooling circuitsVSAvoidweight of equalizing containers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple dedicated equalizing containers into a single common equalizing container that serves multiple cooling circuits. The passive element (check valve) enables this consolidation by automatically separating the cooling circuits when needed, allowing one container to replace several while maintaining independent ventilation capability for each circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The passive element (check valve) acts as an intermediary between the common equalizing container and multiple cooling circuits. It automatically activates to separate circuits when pressure differences indicate thermal interaction risks, enabling the common container to safely serve multiple circuits without requiring multiple dedicated containers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple dedicated equalizing containers are used for different cooling circuits, then each cooling circuit can be independently ventilated, but installation space increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent ventilation of cooling circuitsVSAvoidinstallation space for equalizing containers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates multiple equalizing containers into one common container, reducing the total installation space required. The passive element enables this space-saving merger while maintaining the functional independence needed for separate ventilation of each cooling circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If electric switching valves are used to separate cooling circuits, then circuit separation can be controlled, but actuation and control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation of cooling circuitsVSAvoidcomplexity of valve actuation and control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The passive element (check valve) is self-activating based on pressure differences between cooling circuits. It automatically opens or closes without requiring external control signals, electrical power, or complex actuation mechanisms, thereby simplifying the system while maintaining reliable circuit separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces electric switching valves with a passive mechanical element (check valve) that responds automatically to pressure differences. This substitution eliminates the need for electrical actuation and control systems, reducing device complexity while achieving the same separation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If individual equalizing containers are used for each cooling circuit, then each circuit can be independently managed, but manufacturing and filling processes become complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent management of cooling circuitsVSAvoidmanufacturing and filling process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple equalizing containers into one common container, simplifying manufacturing and filling operations. The passive element enables this consolidation while maintaining the functional independence needed for separate circuit management, thereby improving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

5Weight of stationary object

If a common equalizing container is shared by multiple cooling circuits, then space and weight are reduced, but heat transfer between circuits may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of equalizing containersVSAvoidheat transfer between cooling circuits
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The passive element (check valve) serves as an intermediary that automatically prevents heat transfer between cooling circuits sharing a common equalizing container. When pressure differences indicate potential thermal interaction, the check valve activates to separate the circuits, thereby eliminating the harmful effect while allowing space and weight savings from using a common container.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The passive element provides preliminary protection against heat transfer by automatically activating when pressure differences suggest thermal interaction risks. This preemptive action prevents harmful heat transfer before it can occur, enabling safe sharing of the common equalizing container.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces complexity, saves space and weight, and allows for efficient ventilation of both circuits while preventing unwanted heat transfer, with the passive element ensuring independent separation and the active element maintaining separation during specific operating conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The passive element separates the first cooling circuit from the second cooling circuit if the first pressure is lower than the second pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The passive element utilizes a pressure difference or a pressure gradient between the first and the second cooling circuit for the independent separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11125145B2Cooling system for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 DR ING H C F PORSCHE AG
  • US11125145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooling system for a vehicle has a first cooling circuit, in which a first pressure prevails, and a second cooling circuit, in which a second pressure prevails. The first cooling circuit and the second cooling circuit share a common equalizing container for ventilating. The cooling system has a passive element that separates the first cooling circuit from the second cooling circuit if the first pressure is lower than the second pressure.