Autonomous Vehicle Cornering Energy Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Energy loss during cornering maneuvers in vehicles due to frictional forces and inefficient speed control leads to decreased fuel efficiency, as vehicles typically slow down before turns and re-accelerate afterwards, resulting in suboptimal energy usage.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system equipped with sensors and processing devices that identify curve locations and estimate energy usage at various speeds, selecting an optimal speed for efficient energy use by controlling the vehicle to minimize energy loss through regenerative braking and mechanical losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle slows down before a curve and re-accelerates after the curve, then the vehicle can safely negotiate the turn, but energy loss increases due to frictional forces and re-acceleration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe corneringVSAvoidenergy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of the curve and calculates the optimal entry speed before the vehicle reaches the turn. By determining the target speed in advance and beginning deceleration early, the system minimizes energy loss while ensuring safe cornering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors vehicle speed, position, and curve characteristics, then adjusts the deceleration and acceleration profiles in real-time. This feedback mechanism optimizes energy usage by precisely controlling when and how much to slow down and re-accelerate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If the vehicle maintains high speed through the curve, then energy efficiency is improved, but the vehicle may lose control or safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcornering safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates the optimal entry speed for the curve in advance, considering both safety requirements and energy efficiency. This pre-calculated target speed allows the vehicle to enter the curve at the most efficient speed that still ensures safe negotiation of the turn.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the vehicle speed profile based on real-time conditions, curve characteristics, and energy state. Rather than using fixed speed limits, the system optimizes the speed trajectory to balance safety and energy efficiency throughout the cornering maneuver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If the system autonomously controls vehicle speed optimization, then energy efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple functions into a single integrated controller that handles curve identification, speed optimization calculation, and vehicle control execution. This multi-functional approach reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vehicle's existing sensors and communication infrastructure to identify curves and determine optimal speeds, rather than requiring entirely new detection systems. By leveraging available resources, the system minimizes additional complexity while achieving energy optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system optimizes energy usage by autonomously controlling vehicle speed during cornering maneuvers, reducing energy loss and enhancing fuel efficiency by identifying and managing kinetic energy conversion and storage effectively.

Implementation Method 1

Regenerative braking includes converting kinetic energy into electrical energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRegenerative braking:

Implementation Method 2

The captured electrical energy can be temporarily stored in a battery or fuel cell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy storage: Battery (electricity)

Data Source

PatentUS10246094B2Autonomous vehicle cornering maneuver
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10246094B2 patent drawing
  • US10246094B2 patent drawing
  • US10246094B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example vehicle system includes a sensor and a processing device. The sensor is configured to identify a first location and a second location. The processing device is programmed to estimate a plurality of energy usages. Each energy usage is based at least in part on a speed of a host vehicle at the first location. The processing device is further programmed to select one of the plurality of energy usages as a target useable energy and control the host vehicle in accordance with the speed associated with the target useable energy.