Vehicle Cornering Speed Control Based on Curve Radius

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current speed regulation systems in partially self-driving vehicles do not effectively incorporate the driver's wishes regarding speed adjustments during curve navigation, leading to potential traffic flow disruptions and safety concerns, as they require manual intervention and do not adequately anticipate the driver's desire for minimal speed difference between the setpoint and deceleration speed.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines the maximum transverse acceleration and corresponding deceleration speed for a vehicle based on the speed setpoint and radius of curvature, allowing for automatic adaptation of deceleration speed in curves, thereby anticipating the driver's preference for a smaller speed difference between the setpoint and deceleration speed, especially when the setpoint speed is high.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the speed regulation system automatically reduces speed to a fixed deceleration speed when detecting a curve, then passenger comfort is improved, but the driver's preference for minimal speed difference between setpoint and deceleration speed is not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger comfortVSAvoidadaptation to driver's speed preferences
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the deceleration speed based on the detected radius of curvature, making the speed reduction adaptive rather than fixed. The computer calculates and modifies the deceleration speed in real-time according to the curve characteristics, allowing the system to balance comfort with driver preferences for different curve scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the speed parameter dynamically by calculating a modified deceleration speed that maintains a minimal difference from the speed setpoint. This parameter adjustment is based on the radius of curvature detection, transforming the fixed speed reduction into a variable parameter that adapts to both comfort and driver preference requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the vehicle slows down to a fixed deceleration speed in curves, then curve passage safety is improved, but traffic flow disruption and potential dangerous situations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurve passage safetyVSAvoidtraffic flow disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the deceleration speed based on the detected radius of curvature, creating a flexible speed adjustment that responds to actual road conditions. This dynamic approach prevents excessive or unnecessary slowing down while maintaining safety margins, thereby reducing traffic flow disruptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The computer modifies the deceleration speed parameter to maintain it close to the speed setpoint, changing the fixed speed reduction into a variable parameter. This parameter optimization ensures safety by maintaining adequate speed differences for curve negotiation while minimizing harmful traffic flow disruptions through intelligent speed selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If manual intervention is required to adjust speed setpoint, then driver control is maintained, but ease of operation and responsiveness to driver's wishes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver controlVSAvoidtime for manual adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment of the deceleration speed by automatically detecting the radius of curvature and calculating the optimal speed modification. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual driver intervention while still respecting driver preferences, as the system autonomously optimizes the speed parameter based on detected conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The computer continuously monitors the radius of curvature and uses this feedback to automatically adjust the deceleration speed. This feedback loop enables the system to respond immediately to changing road conditions without requiring manual input, maintaining both driver control and operational efficiency through automated responsive adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11827218B2Control of the speed of a vehicle when cornering in accordance with the speed setpoint
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 PSA AUTOMOBILES SA
  • US11827218B2 patent drawing
  • US11827218B2 patent drawing
  • US11827218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method intended to regulate the speed of a vehicle with at least partially automated driving and knowing the radius of curvature of a future segment which it is about to take on its route. This method comprises a step (10-90) which involves regulating the speed of the vehicle in accordance with a speed setpoint and, in the event that a radius of curvature of the future segment representative of a bend is detected, determining a maximum transverse acceleration that the vehicle can undergo in the bend depending on the speed setpoint, then a maximum speed that the vehicle would have in the bend if it underwent this maximum transverse acceleration in the presence of the detected radius of curvature, then imposing a deceleration phase on the vehicle until a deceleration speed chosen as a function of this determined maximum speed is reached.