Vehicle Cost Comparison Controller with Maintenance Fee Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies fail to provide users with accurate comparisons of vehicle costs across different payment methods, including installment payments, residual value loans, and leasing, as they do not account for varying maintenance fees associated with each method.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that accepts user input regarding the type of vehicle, desired options, and payment terms, and outputs a comparison of payment amounts including maintenance fees for multiple payment methods, allowing users to make informed decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If existing technologies display total payment amount and monthly payment amount for installment payments and leasing, then users can compare payment amounts between different methods, but users cannot obtain accurate information regarding total vehicle costs including maintenance fees

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of cost informationVSAvoidcomplexity of information processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cost information into distinct components: payment amounts (total and monthly) and maintenance fees (annual and monthly). By separating these elements and displaying them independently, the system provides comprehensive cost information without overwhelming the user, thus improving information accuracy while managing complexity through structured presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If the system provides comprehensive cost comparisons including maintenance fees for multiple payment methods, then users receive more accurate vehicle cost information, but the information processing and presentation becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of cost comparisonVSAvoidcomplexity of information processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed to universally handle multiple payment methods (installment payments, residual value loans, leasing) and calculate both payment amounts and maintenance fees for each method. This multi-functional approach enables precise cost comparison across different financing options while consolidating the processing logic within a single system, thereby achieving measurement precision without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to cost comparison by incorporating maintenance fees alongside payment amounts. Instead of displaying only monetary values, the system presents costs across multiple dimensions (payment structure and maintenance requirements), enabling more precise and comprehensive cost analysis while organizing information in a structured format that manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250054032A1Information processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20250054032A1 patent drawing
  • US20250054032A1 patent drawing
  • US20250054032A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an information processing apparatus, a controller receives input of an information including a type of a vehicle desired by a user, an options desired by the user, and a payment terms for acquiring the right to use the vehicle. In response to the receiving input of the information including the type of the vehicle desired by the user, the options desired by the user, and the payment terms for the fees to acquire the right to use the vehicle, the controller outputs an information comparing the payment amounts including maintenance fees for plurality of payment methods.