Vehicle Crossing Warning Timing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle crossing warning systems face challenges in providing consistent warning times due to factors like varying vehicle speeds, electrical interference, and communication delays, leading to inconsistent and often overly long wait times for motorists, which can result in impatient behavior and safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a determination module onboard a vehicle and a remote crossing system that communicates absolute timing information to ensure consistent warning times, using bidirectional communication to activate crossing warnings only when necessary, and transmitting arrival times before entering the detection range to account for speed changes and communication delays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If occupancy-based track circuits are used to activate crossings, then the system can function in electrified areas with high electrical interference, but warning times become excessively long and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionality in electrified areasVSAvoidwarning time duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the warning activation into two independent systems: (1) occupancy-based track circuits for reliable detection in electrified areas, and (2) predictor circuits for timing-based activation. The crossing activation is triggered by the earlier of the two systems, allowing each to operate in its optimal environment while their outputs are coordinated through a common control logic that prevents excessive delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a mediator logic layer that receives inputs from both occupancy-based and predictor-based systems. This intermediary control logic processes both signals and determines the optimal activation time, ensuring that the crossing is activated early enough for safety but not excessively early causing unnecessary delay. The mediator coordinates the two different detection approaches and outputs a unified control signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If predictor circuits are used to detect vehicles, then warning times can be reduced and made more consistent, but they fail in electrified areas with high electrical interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning time consistencyVSAvoiddetection accuracy in electrified areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection system into two separate circuits with distinct functions: predictor circuits handle timing-based detection in areas with low electrical interference, while occupancy-based circuits provide reliable detection in electrified areas. Each circuit operates independently in its optimal environment, and their outputs are integrated through mediator logic that selects the appropriate activation time based on local conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal crossing control system that can operate in multiple environments (electrified and non-electrified areas) by incorporating both predictor and occupancy-based detection methods. The system automatically adapts to local conditions and uses the most reliable detection method available at each location, making the overall system universally applicable across different railway environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If crossings are activated early to account for communication delays, then safety is improved, but wait times become excessively long and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of crossing activationVSAvoidmotorist wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the crossing activation timing dynamic rather than static. Instead of using a fixed advance warning time, the system continuously adjusts the activation time based on real-time vehicle position, speed, and detected arrival time. The mediator logic dynamically calculates the optimal activation moment that accounts for communication delays while minimizing unnecessary wait time, creating a responsive system that adapts to actual traffic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors vehicle approach and adjusts activation timing accordingly. The predictor circuit provides feedback on estimated arrival time, which feeds back to the mediator logic to refine the activation decision. This closed-loop feedback ensures that the crossing is activated at the optimal moment, accounting for communication delays without causing excessive wait times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9126609B2Systems and methods for controlling warnings at vehicle crossings
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 KB SIGNALING INC
  • US9126609B2 patent drawing
  • US9126609B2 patent drawing
  • US9126609B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a timing determination module configured to be disposed onboard an approaching vehicle system during travel of the approaching vehicle system along a first route toward a crossing between the first route and a second route. The timing determination module is configured to determine one or more arrival times of the approaching vehicle system to reach the crossing and to repeatedly communicate notification messages having the one or more arrival times to a remote crossing system that is configured to activate one or more warning devices disposed at or near the crossing to notify other vehicles on the second route that the approaching vehicle system is approaching the crossing along the first route. The timing determination module is configured to determine the one or more arrival times at different respective locations along the first route as the approaching vehicle system travels toward the crossing.