Vehicle Data Processing Method for Cost Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high costs associated with data storage and transfer in automated driving systems, particularly in semiautomated and highly automated vehicles, are exacerbated by the generation of large data volumes and the inefficiency of recording non-relevant data, leading to increased memory usage and prolonged recording campaigns, as well as limited data transfer in operational fleets due to cost constraints.

Innovation Solution

A method that assesses the value of data in real-time within the vehicle, using a cost function to determine whether to store or transfer data externally, prioritizing data based on technical usability and timeliness, allowing for efficient decision-making on storage and transfer, thereby reducing costs and optimizing memory usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If all generated data are stored in the vehicle and transferred later, then complete data sets are available for development, but storage costs and transfer costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidstorage and transfer costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of data value immediately upon generation in the vehicle, determining which data are worth storing and transferring before actual storage or transfer occurs. This preliminary classification avoids storing low-value data and ensures high-value data are prioritized for transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Different data receive different treatment based on their assessed value. High-value data are transferred externally, medium-value data are stored locally with selective transfer, and low-value data are discarded. This differentiated approach optimizes both data completeness and cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If memory capacity is increased to store more data, then data availability improves, but vehicle costs and storage efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata storage capacityVSAvoidvehicle cost and memory optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts data retention policies based on real-time assessment of data value and current storage capacity. As storage fills up, the system prioritizes keeping high-value data and discarding low-value data, rather than using static storage allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of data value assessment continuously, evaluating data based on timeliness, novelty, and relevance to development goals. This allows the same storage capacity to effectively hold more valuable data over time as data age and lose value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If data transfer volume is limited to reduce costs, then transfer costs decrease, but data value for development is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer costVSAvoiddata value for development
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of data value immediately upon generation in the vehicle, determining which data are worth storing and transferring before actual storage or transfer occurs. This preliminary classification avoids storing low-value data and ensures high-value data are prioritized for transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from development results to continuously improve data value assessment. As development goals become clearer and data patterns are understood better, the system refines its ability to identify which data are most valuable, optimizing transfer decisions over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of information

If recording campaigns are extended to capture more situations of interest, then data quality improves, but recording duration and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata quality and noveltyVSAvoidrecording campaign duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of data value immediately upon generation in the vehicle, determining which data are worth storing and transferring before actual storage or transfer occurs. This preliminary classification avoids storing low-value data and ensures high-value data are prioritized for transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical approach of extending recording duration with an intelligent filtering system that identifies and captures valuable data situations regardless of campaign length. This substitution of intelligent detection for extended time-based recording reduces campaign duration while maintaining data quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20230230429A1Method for processing data in a vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.07.20 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20230230429A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for processing data in a vehicle. The method includes: a) receiving data of components of the vehicle, b) checking the received data with respect their value for the development, further development, and/or the serial operation of vehicles and/or components thereof, c) deciding in consideration of step b) whether the data are to be stored in the vehicle (1) or sent to a vehicle-external location.