Vehicle Deactivation via Random Bus Subscriber Selection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing systems for deactivating motor vehicles lack reliability and efficiency, as they do not provide a secure method to prevent unauthorized reactivation after deactivation.
Innovation Solution
A method involving a deactivation system with multiple bus subscribers, where a random selection of bus subscribers is used to send deactivation commands to essential components, making it difficult to reactivate the vehicle without replacing or reprogramming all involved units, and utilizing a central control system for secure and remote deactivation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional deactivation systems are used, then the vehicle can be deactivated, but the reliability of deactivation is insufficient and unauthorized reactivation is possible
Solution Approach 1:
The deactivation function is segmented across multiple bus subscribers instead of being centralized in a single control unit. Each bus subscriber independently holds a portion of the deactivation capability, and all must be simultaneously compromised for reactivation to occur. This segmentation dramatically increases deactivation reliability while distributing system complexity across multiple simple, identical components rather than one complex component.
2Reliability
If multiple bus subscribers are involved in deactivation, then reactivation security improves, but the number of components requiring coordination increases
Solution Approach 1:
All bus subscribers involved in the deactivation function are made homogeneous - they have identical hardware architectures, identical software structures, and identical deactivation capabilities. This homogeneity simplifies system coordination because all components behave predictably and can be replaced interchangeably. The security benefit arises from the combination of multiple homogeneous units rather than from their individual complexity.
3Reliability
If random selection of bus subscribers is used, then the probability of unauthorized reactivation decreases to 1/N, but the selection and management process becomes more complex
Solution Approach 1:
The assignment of deactivation functions to bus subscribers is made dynamic through random selection rather than fixed assignment. This dynamic approach ensures that the specific set of bus subscribers holding deactivation capabilities changes unpredictably, preventing unauthorized reactivation. The complexity of managing this dynamic assignment is minimal because the system uses simple random number generation and standard bus communication protocols already present in modern vehicles.
4Ease of operation
If remote deactivation via software function is used, then deactivation can be initiated remotely, but the system does not provide reliable deactivation
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the remote deactivation command and the vehicle's control systems. Instead of directly controlling a single deactivation unit, the system uses multiple bus subscribers as intermediaries that collectively execute the deactivation function. This intermediary structure maintains remote operability while significantly improving reliability, as all intermediary units must be compromised for successful reactivation.
Data Source
AI summary
The invention relates to a method for deactivating a motor vehicle, wherein the motor vehicle comprises a deactivation system having a plurality of bus subscribers each having a deactivation function, said method comprising: selecting, on the basis of a random number, a set of bus subscribers from a plurality of bus subscribers having the deactivation function in order to provide the deactivation of the motor vehicle.

