Multi-Angle Vehicle Defect Measurement With Surface-Adaptive Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Detecting defects in vehicles' exterior surfaces, such as dents, bents, holes, tears, and scratches, is challenging due to extensive surfaces and the need to scan numerous vehicles efficiently, and existing methods struggle with accurate dimension estimation due to varying distances between vehicles and sensors.

Innovation Solution

Deploying image sensors paired with depth sensors to capture 2D and 3D images simultaneously, registering these images to determine the distance of defects, and using known reference features to compute real-world dimensions, allowing for efficient and accurate defect estimation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple image sensors are deployed to scan extensive vehicle surfaces, then defect detection coverage is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle exterior surface coverageVSAvoidsensor deployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the vehicle exterior scanning task into multiple segments by deploying image sensors at different locations (front, rear, sides) and processing defects in different vehicle regions separately. Each sensor captures a specific portion of the vehicle surface, and the system integrates these segmented measurements to achieve comprehensive coverage of the entire vehicle exterior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If traditional single-distance measurement methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to varying distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect dimension estimation accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from traditional 2D image analysis to 3D spatial measurement by integrating depth information. Depth sensors (such as time-of-flight sensors or stereo cameras) capture the third dimension (distance from sensor to vehicle surface), enabling accurate calculation of defect real-world dimensions even when the vehicle is at varying distances from the image sensors. This dimensional addition resolves the measurement accuracy problem without requiring fixed-distance positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If comprehensive defect analysis is performed on all vehicle sides, then detection completeness is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection completenessVSAvoidprocessing time per vehicle
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and analyzing images from different vehicle sides in parallel during the vehicle scanning process. Instead of sequentially processing each side after complete data collection, the system begins analyzing defects on each vehicle side as soon as the corresponding images are captured, overlapping the data collection and processing phases to reduce total processing time while maintaining complete defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12517061B2Multi-angle vehicle defect measurement using surface-adaptive optical corrections
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 UVEYE LTD
  • US12517061B2 patent drawing
  • US12517061B2 patent drawing
  • US12517061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for estimating dimensions of vehicle exterior defects using multiple cameras arranged in a predefined configuration. The method comprises receiving images from multiple strategically positioned image sensors including side cameras parallel to a vehicle height axis, diagonal cameras at an inclined angle, and roof top cameras perpendicular to the height axis. An angle to detected defects is computed based on image sensor parameters. Different distance calculations are applied based on vehicle section location, with specialized formulas for windshield, back window, and roof components. Defect sizes are computed by determining multiple defect dimensions, with at least one dimension being adjusted by an angular correction factor derived from the relationship between camera angle and vehicle surface orientation. The system implements comprehensive validation through cross-referencing between cameras, comparison with known specifications, and measurement consistency analysis across multiple frames.