Vehicle Door Handle Assembly Using Rotating Hook Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle door handle assembly processes are time-consuming and require significant effort due to complex structures, and there is a need for easier assembly and disassembly, especially with the integration of electronic components in keyless entry systems.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle door handle design featuring a handle main body and cover assembled using a first assembly portion for tightening and a second assembly portion with engagement pieces, including recessed and protruding portions, allowing for easy engagement and disengagement by rotating the handle components, reducing the risk of deformation or breakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the handle cover is engaged with the handle main body using a protruding portion and recessed portion, then the assembly operation appears easier, but the handle cover may be broken due to excessive deformation force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly operationVSAvoidhandle cover strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The engagement mechanism is divided into two separate portions: a first engagement portion with recessed and protruding portions for initial positioning, and a second engagement portion with a hook portion for final securing. This segmentation allows the assembly process to occur in stages, reducing the risk of excessive force application to the handle cover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first engagement portion performs the preliminary action of positioning and partially securing the handle cover to the handle main body. This preliminary engagement allows the components to be aligned properly before the second engagement portion is activated, preventing misalignment-related deformation during the final engagement step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If tightening is performed at two locations to secure the handle cover, then the connection is more reliable, but much time and effort are required for assembly operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The two engagement portions are designed to be activated in sequence within a single assembly operation. The first engagement portion is engaged during the initial assembly, and the second engagement portion is engaged by a simple rotating motion of the handle cover, combining what would otherwise be two separate operations into one streamlined process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The second engagement portion utilizes a rotating mechanism where the handle cover itself serves as the actuating element. By rotating the handle cover, the hook portion of the second engagement portion is automatically engaged, converting a potentially time-consuming manual fastening operation into a quick rotational motion that secures both engagement portions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If the handle cover is deformed to engage with the handle main body, then the components can be assembled, but much care is required to prevent breakage, increasing assembly time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly processVSAvoidassembly operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The engagement mechanism is divided into two separate portions: a first engagement portion with recessed and protruding portions for initial positioning, and a second engagement portion with a hook portion for final securing. This segmentation allows the assembly process to occur in stages, reducing the risk of excessive force application to the handle cover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement mechanism transitions from a static interference fit to a dynamic hooking mechanism. The second engagement portion changes the engagement parameter from direct contact pressure to a mechanical hook-over configuration, eliminating the need for excessive deformation force and reducing assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8042845B2Vehicle door handle
Publication Date: 2011.10.25 AISIN SEIKI KK
  • US8042845B2 patent drawing
  • US8042845B2 patent drawing
  • US8042845B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle door handle includes a handle main body, a handle cover assembled to the handle main body by means of a first assembly portion and a second assembly portion, and the second assembly portion including: a first engagement portion having a recessed portion and a protruding portion; and a second engagement portion provided at the other of the handle main body and the handle cover and having a hook portion hooking over the first engagement portion, wherein, the handle cover engages the handle main body by rotating at least either one of the handle cover and the handle main body while the second engagement portion hooks over the first engagement portion in a manner where a top end of the hook portion of the second engagement portion is positioned within the recessed portion of the first engagement portion.