Vehicle Door Collision Avoidance via Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle door opening mechanisms are prone to damage from collisions with objects, inconvenient for certain individuals, and may not anticipate moving objects, leading to potential collisions and damage.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes an operator interface, sensors, and a powered actuator controlled by a controller to determine whether to open or close the door manually or automatically, with sensors detecting objects in the path to prevent collisions by adjusting the door's movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual door operation is used, then the design is simple and easy to implement, but the operator may cause damage to the door or surrounding objects due to lack of collision detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of door mechanismVSAvoidcollision prevention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A sensor system acts as an intermediary between the door operator and the door itself, detecting objects in the door's path and providing feedback to the controller. This intermediary layer enables automated collision prevention while maintaining a relatively simple manual operation interface, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using sensors to continuously monitor the environment around the door and providing real-time information to the controller. When an object is detected in the projected path, the controller adjusts the door operation accordingly, enabling reliable collision prevention without significantly complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If manual door operation is used, then the mechanism is simple, but operation is inconvenient for children, the elderly, and the disabled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of door mechanismVSAvoidaccessibility for all users
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The door system performs self-service by automatically detecting objects and adjusting its own operation through the sensor-controller-actuator loop. This eliminates the need for complex manual manipulation, making the door accessible to children, the elderly, and the disabled while maintaining a simple overall mechanism that is easy to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely mechanical manual operation with an automated system that uses sensors and controlled actuators. This substitution provides power-assisted operation that is easy for all users while keeping the mechanical structure relatively simple, thus improving ease of operation without significantly increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Shape

If a handle-less design is implemented, then aesthetic appearance is improved, but the operator interface becomes less obvious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearanceVSAvoidoperator interface visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The operator interface serves as an intermediary that mediates between the aesthetic handle-less design and the user's opening command. Subtle indicators or touch-sensitive surfaces provide the necessary interface functionality without compromising the clean aesthetic appearance, allowing the door to maintain both visual appeal and usability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If automated powered actuator is used, then collision prevention capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention capabilityVSAvoiddoor operation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated door system is segmented into distinct functional modules: sensor array for object detection, controller for decision-making, and actuator for door movement. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture, enabling reliable collision prevention without excessive complexity. The modular structure makes the system manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11225822B2System and method for opening and closing vehicle door
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 FARADAY&FUTURE INC
  • US11225822B2 patent drawing
  • US11225822B2 patent drawing
  • US11225822B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for opening and closing a door of a vehicle may include receiving a signal indicative of either opening or closing the vehicle door, determining whether the opening or closing will be performed by an operator or via a powered actuator based on the signal, and generating, if the opening or closing will be performed by the powered actuator, a first control signal indicative of a first position to which the door is to be moved. The method may further include controlling the powered actuator to cause the door to move from an original position to the first position.