Vehicle Door Obstruction Detection via Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle door systems lack advanced features for automatic operation and obstruction detection, leading to inefficient access and potential collisions during opening and closing.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle door system comprising a door actuator, sensors, and a controller that captures environmental data to identify objects and determine clearance times, controlling the door to open or close safely and prevent collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional manual door operation is used, then device complexity is low, but ease of operation is reduced for users with mobility issues and productivity is lowered due to manual effort required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of door operationVSAvoiddoor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door system operates autonomously by detecting user approach through sensors and automatically opening/closing the door without manual intervention, allowing the system to serve itself and the user simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical door operation with an automated electromechanical system comprising sensors, controllers, and actuators that detect user presence and execute door opening/closing actions automatically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If door opens immediately without detection, then productivity is high with quick access, but object-affected harmful factors increase due to potential collisions with pedestrians or objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor operation speedVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of the environment and identifies pedestrians or objects in the door path before executing the door opening action, allowing advance preparation and safety verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system continuously monitors the environment and provides feedback to the controller, which adjusts door operation timing and speed based on detected objects, creating a closed-loop safety system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If door closes without clearance detection, then productivity is high with rapid closure, but object-affected harmful factors increase due to potential collisions with approaching objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor closure speedVSAvoidcollision risk during closure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of approaching objects and calculates clearance time before initiating door closure, ensuring safe operation by verifying the path is clear or objects are far enough away

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The door closure operation is made dynamic and adaptive, with the controller adjusting closure speed and timing based on real-time sensor data about approaching objects, rather than using fixed mechanical closure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of time

If manual door operation is used, then device complexity is low, but loss of time increases due to manual effort and positioning required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for door operationVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated door system eliminates the need for users to manually operate the door, allowing the system to perform the operation autonomously and reducing the time users spend on this task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical door operation with an automated electromechanical system comprising sensors, controllers, and actuators that detect user presence and execute door opening/closing actions automatically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Reliability

If door system lacks obstruction detection, then device complexity is low, but reliability decreases due to potential collisions and unsafe operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe door operationVSAvoidsensor and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system continuously monitors the environment and provides feedback to the controller, which adjusts door operation timing and speed based on detected objects, creating a closed-loop safety system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of the environment and identifies pedestrians or objects in the door path before executing the door opening action, allowing advance preparation and safety verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10161175B2Moving object detection for power door system
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10161175B2 patent drawing
  • US10161175B2 patent drawing
  • US10161175B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle door system is disclosed. The system comprises a door actuator, at least one sensor, and a controller. The at least one sensor is configured to capture data corresponding to an environment local to the vehicle. The controller is configured to process the data to identify at least one object moving proximate the vehicle and control the door actuator to oppose an opening motion of the door in response to the identification of the object.