Vehicle Drive Controller Mode Switching Shock Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicles with motors as drive sources experience a temporary decrease in actual driving force during mode switching of the motor's pole number, leading to discomfort for the driver due to generated shock.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle configuration with a motor and an engine as parallel drive sources, where the drive controller adjusts the target driving force of the engine to be higher than the motor's during mode switching, compensating for the motor's force decrease and minimizing shock.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the motor switches modes (changes pole number or torque type), then the motor can adapt to different driving conditions and improve overall efficiency, but the actual driving force temporarily decreases during switching causing driver discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor mode adaptabilityVSAvoiddriver discomfort from shock
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The drive controller predicts future driving force requirements and performs mode switching in advance before the actual need arises. By anticipating future driving conditions and switching modes proactively, the system ensures the motor is already in the optimal mode when needed, avoiding temporary driving force decreases and resulting driver discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the mode switching timing based on predicted future driving force requirements rather than using fixed switching criteria. The drive controller continuously monitors driving conditions and adapts the switching strategy in real-time, optimizing the balance between mode adaptability and maintaining smooth driving force delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If mode switching is performed frequently to optimize performance, then energy efficiency improves, but the cumulative energy loss during switching increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy loss during switchingVSAvoidoverall energy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive controller performs mode switching in advance based on predicted future driving force requirements, rather than waiting for immediate needs. This proactive approach reduces the frequency and magnitude of emergency switching events, thereby minimizing cumulative energy losses during mode transitions while still maintaining optimal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from actual driving force requirements and mode switching performance to continuously optimize switching decisions. By monitoring the effectiveness of previous switching events and adjusting future switching timing accordingly, the system minimizes unnecessary switching operations and reduces cumulative energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11485236B2Vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 SUBARU CORP
  • US11485236B2 patent drawing
  • US11485236B2 patent drawing
  • US11485236B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a motor, a second drive source, and a drive controller. The motor is a first drive source configured to drive wheels. The motor has a plurality of switchable modes that differ in at least one of a number of poles or a type of torque for rotating a rotor. The second drive source is configured to drive the wheels in parallel with the motor. The drive controller is configured to set, during switching of the modes, a target driving force of the second drive source to be larger than a target driving force of the second drive source before the switching of the modes.