Vehicle Driver Feedback System Using Discrete Performance Categories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for providing feedback to vehicle drivers are often delayed, making it difficult for drivers to associate feedback with their actual performance and can lead to defensive driving behaviors due to overt observation, and existing methods lack real-time, actionable insights into driving metrics.

Innovation Solution

A system that collects and processes vehicle metrics in real-time, categorizing them into discrete performance categories and providing sensory feedback to drivers through a light cluster, allowing for immediate awareness and correction of driving behavior, using historical metrics to define performance categories such as better-than, close-to, and worse-than averages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If feedback is provided after analysis of driver performance data, then feedback can be generated based on comprehensive data collection, but the feedback is delayed and drivers may not recall the actual performance events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback accuracyVSAvoidfeedback delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of driving events into discrete categories (e.g., aggressive acceleration, harsh braking) as they occur, storing these classified events for later feedback generation. This allows the system to have analysis-ready data prepared in advance, so when feedback is provided, it can immediately reference the classified event without requiring real-time analysis delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where classified driving events are stored and then referenced when generating feedback for the driver. The feedback system retrieves the previously classified event data and presents it to the driver with minimal delay, ensuring the driver can recall the actual performance event while still receiving comprehensive analyzed feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If an overt observer is placed in the vehicle to monitor driver performance, then feedback can be provided in a timely manner, but the driver may alter driving behavior due to the observer's presence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback timingVSAvoiddriving behavior authenticity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an automated classification system as an intermediary between the driver and the feedback process. Sensors and processors automatically classify driving events without requiring a human observer in the vehicle. This intermediary system captures authentic driver behavior while enabling timely feedback, as the automated system processes events in real-time without the psychological impact of human observation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human observation with an automated electronic classification system. The system uses sensors, processors, and algorithms to detect and classify driving events objectively, eliminating the need for an overt human observer while maintaining timely feedback capability and preserving authentic driver behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If continuous monitoring of driver performance is implemented, then real-time feedback can be provided, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback response speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments continuous driving data into discrete, pre-defined event categories (e.g., aggressive acceleration, harsh braking, rapid deceleration). By segmenting the continuous data stream into discrete classified events, the system reduces computational complexity while maintaining real-time monitoring capability. Each segment corresponds to a specific driving behavior that can be independently classified and processed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transforming continuous driving data into discrete classified events with specific thresholds and categories. This parameter transformation simplifies the data processing requirements, as the system only needs to detect when specific parameter thresholds are exceeded rather than continuously analyzing all aspects of driving behavior in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9783109B2System and method for providing feedback to a vehicle driver
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 TRAPEZE SOFTWARE GRP
  • US9783109B2 patent drawing
  • US9783109B2 patent drawing
  • US9783109B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for providing feedback to a vehicle driver are provided. Metrics are collected for a vehicle being operated. The metrics are categorized into one of a set of discrete performance categories. Sensory feedback is presented to a driver of the vehicle corresponding to the one discrete performance category.