Vehicle Dynamics Actuator Control for Driver Skill Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to effectively tailor vehicle dynamics to the skill level of the driver and handling type, leading to inconsistent driving experiences across different road conditions and operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system that determines the driver's skill level and handling type based on lateral and longitudinal acceleration, steering wheel angle, and other parameters, adjusting dynamics actuators such as electronic limited slip differentials, power steering, and braking systems to provide tailored vehicle responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If vehicle control systems use fixed dynamics settings, then system complexity is reduced, but driving experience consistency across different skill levels deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to driver skill levelVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts vehicle dynamics parameters based on detected driver skill level and handling type. The system transitions from fixed settings to adaptive settings by modifying actuator commands in real-time based on driver behavior patterns, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity through intelligent control rather than physical reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters such as steering assist levels, differential torque distribution, and brake modulation based on identified driver skill levels. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system achieves adaptability to different drivers without requiring fundamentally different hardware configurations for each skill level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the system adjusts dynamics actuators for each driver, then driving experience consistency improves, but response time deteriorates due to multiple processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving experience consistencyVSAvoidsystem response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of driver skill level and handling type during initial driving phases or low-load conditions. By pre-determining the appropriate dynamics profile before critical maneuvers, the system minimizes processing delays during time-sensitive driving situations while maintaining experience consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors driver behavior and adjusts dynamics settings in real-time feedback loops. This ongoing adaptation allows the system to maintain consistent driving experiences without requiring complete re-evaluation of driver characteristics, thereby reducing processing time while preserving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple actuators are controlled simultaneously, then vehicle dynamics tailoring improves, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle dynamics tailoringVSAvoidactuator coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system merges the coordination of multiple actuators (steering, braking, powertrain, differential) into a unified control architecture that adjusts all actuators based on a single driver classification. This integration reduces the effective complexity by treating the actuator group as a coordinated system rather than independent components requiring separate control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10442427B2Vehicle dynamics actuator control systems and methods
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10442427B2 patent drawing
  • US10442427B2 patent drawing
  • US10442427B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control system includes a first error module that determines a first yaw error based on a difference between a yaw rate of the vehicle and a target yaw rate. A second error module determines a second yaw error based on the first yaw error and a target yaw error. A target yaw error module sets the target yaw error based on a skill level of a driver of the vehicle. An adjustment module selectively one of increases and decreases a target adjustment when the second yaw error is greater than a first predetermined threshold. An actuator control module, in response to the increase in the target adjustment, actuates a dynamics actuator of the vehicle.