Vehicle Driving Dynamics Control via Real-Time Power Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle control systems lack dynamic control over driving dynamics, limiting precise manipulation of power distribution and traction, which restricts high-performance driving capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a user input device and computing system that dynamically controls driving dynamics by altering power output balance between vehicle wheels, allowing real-time adjustment of power distribution and braking forces based on user input, enabling enhanced control over vehicle behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional static drivetrain controls are used, then the system is simple and reliable, but precise control of vehicle dynamics is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of drivetrain parameters by allowing real-time adjustment of power distribution between front and rear wheels, throttle response characteristics, and brake force allocation. The system transitions from static preset modes to continuously adjustable dynamic parameters controlled by user input devices, enabling precise manipulation of vehicle dynamics during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a unified platform that manages power distribution, throttle control, brake force allocation, and drivetrain parameter adjustment through common user input devices. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to perform what previously required multiple separate controls and adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If preset drive modes are used, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to specific driving conditions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving dynamics adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces static preset modes with dynamic, continuously adjustable parameters. Users can modify power distribution ratios, throttle response curves, and brake force allocation in real-time based on specific driving conditions and preferences, rather than being constrained to fixed mode selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous adjustment of key drivetrain parameters including power distribution between axles, throttle response characteristics, and brake force allocation ratios. These parameter changes enable the system to adapt to varying driving conditions and user preferences while maintaining ease of operation through intuitive input devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If real-time dynamic control is implemented, then vehicle performance and handling are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor vehicle state parameters and adjust drivetrain control accordingly. This feedback loop ensures reliable and predictable vehicle behavior during dynamic control operations, maintaining stability while enabling enhanced performance capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary control elements including user input devices, computing systems, and control algorithms that mediate between driver intent and actual drivetrain actuation. These intermediaries manage the complexity of real-time dynamic control while presenting a simplified interface to the user, ensuring reliable control execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12071007B2Systems and methods for controlling driving dynamics in a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 AKRUS INC
  • US12071007B2 patent drawing
  • US12071007B2 patent drawing
  • US12071007B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling movement of a vehicle includes a user input device and computing system. The user input device dynamically controls a settings or balance of driving dynamics in a vehicle, and the user input device is configured to receive a manual input from a user. The computing system controls the settings of the vehicle driving dynamics and/or balance of the vehicle, the computing system is in data communication with the user input device and configured to change the driving dynamics balance proportionately to the manual input upon receiving an input command based on the manual input from the user input device.