Vehicle Electronic Device Projecting Tab Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic device assembly methods, such as screwing and elastic or snap fit couplings, are inefficient and unsuitable for thin, flexible, or fragile components like printed circuit boards, requiring high precision and time-consuming steps.

Innovation Solution

The use of projecting tabs on a supporting frame that can be bent to attach electronic substrates without screws, providing a visual indication of completed attachment and acting as mistake-proofing mechanisms to ensure proper assembly, with conductive paste strands for electromagnetic protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If screwing is used to assemble internal components, then reliable attachment is achieved, but assembly time increases and high precision tooling is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the screwing mechanical system with a snap-fit coupling system. The elastic covering element engages with fixing elements on the supporting frame through elastic deformation, eliminating the need for screws and high-precision tooling while maintaining secure attachment. This substitution reduces assembly time and tooling requirements while preserving attachment reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes elastic deformation as a key parameter change. The covering element is designed to elastically deform during assembly to engage with the fixing elements, then maintain this deformed state to provide secure attachment. This elastic parameter change enables quick assembly without screws while ensuring reliable fixation of the electronic substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If elastic or snap fit couplings are used, then assembly time is reduced, but reliable coupling for thin, flexible, or fragile parts cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly timeVSAvoidcoupling reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing the covering element with different properties in different regions. The covering element has elastic properties for quick engagement but incorporates recesses and structural features that provide localized support and protection for thin, flexible electronic substrates. This localized quality enhancement ensures coupling reliability for fragile parts while maintaining fast assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by designing the covering element with elastic properties that absorb assembly forces and protect fragile electronic substrates during the snap-fit process. The elastic deformation acts as a cushion, preventing damage to thin or flexible parts while ensuring reliable coupling. This prior cushioning enables fast assembly without compromising the integrity of fragile components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If projecting tabs are bent to attach substrates, then assembly is simplified and accelerated, but visual indication of completion is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidassembly status indication
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses color changes as a visual indication mechanism. The covering element or fixing elements are designed with visible color differences between the assembled and unassembled states. When the projecting tabs are properly bent and engaged, the color indication shows assembly completion, providing immediate visual feedback to operators and eliminating uncertainty about assembly status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

4Reliability

If projecting tabs are used as mistake-proofing, then incorrect assembly is prevented, but tab design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly accuracyVSAvoidtab design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry to the projecting tabs and corresponding recesses in the covering element. The tabs are designed with asymmetric shapes that only fit into matching asymmetric recesses in the correct orientation. This asymmetric design provides built-in mistake-proofing, preventing incorrect assembly while the actual tab geometry remains relatively simple. The asymmetry is minimal and does not significantly increase manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP3993590B1Electronic device for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.07.24 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • EP3993590B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3993590B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3993590B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Electronic device such as a camera for a vehicle, including: - a supporting frame (10), - a main electronic substrate (20), provided with at least one electric or electronic component or circuit and coupled to the supporting frame (10); - a secondary electronic substrate (30), provided with at least one electric or electronic component or circuit and coupled to the supporting frame (10); - wherein the supporting frame (10) has at least one main projecting tab (11) and at least one secondary projecting tab (12), each capable to occupy a non-twisted position or a twisted position, wherein the main projecting tab (11), when in the twisted position, is providing an attachment of the main electronic substrate (20) to the supporting frame (10), and wherein the secondary projecting tab (12), when in the twisted position, is providing an attachment of the secondary electronic substrate (30) to the supporting frame (10).