In-Vehicle eNodeB Proactive Warning via GPS Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current public warning systems in LTE networks fail to provide timely warnings to mobile eNodeBs, such as those installed in emergency vehicles, until they enter a danger zone, which can be life-threatening in scenarios like approaching areas under threat from natural calamities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dynamic public warning system using Parallel Wireless's HetNet Gateway (HNG) with self-organizing networking (SON) and in-vehicle eNodeBs, which utilizes GPS coordinates to determine the geographic location of mobile eNodeBs relative to emergency areas and sends warning messages proactively when they approach a danger zone.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional PWS sends warning messages only when eNodeBs enter emergency areas, then network infrastructure complexity is reduced, but warning timeliness deteriorates making it life-threatening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning timelinessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining the geographic location of mobile eNodeBs using GPS coordinates before they enter emergency areas. The coordinating server proactively identifies when mobile eNodeBs are approaching danger zones and sends warning messages in advance, rather than waiting for entry into the emergency area. This preliminary detection and warning mechanism ensures timely alerts while maintaining manageable system complexity through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If GPS tracking and proactive warning mechanisms are implemented, then warning timeliness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning delayVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a coordinating server as an intermediary between mobile eNodeBs and the PWS infrastructure. This intermediary centralizes the complex functions of GPS coordinate reception, geographic area determination, and proactive warning message routing. By placing the coordination logic at the server level rather than in each eNodeB, the system achieves timely warnings through continuous location monitoring while keeping individual device complexity low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If mobile eNodeBs continuously report GPS coordinates, then warning accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by having mobile eNodeBs report GPS coordinates at intervals rather than continuously. The coordinating server requests location information and receives updates periodically, determining geographic locations based on these periodic reports. This approach maintains sufficient location accuracy for warning purposes while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous reporting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11096032B2Dynamic public warning system for in-vehicle eNodeB
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 PARALLEL WIRELESS INC
  • US11096032B2 patent drawing
  • US11096032B2 patent drawing
  • US11096032B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed, comprising: sending position information reflecting a current position of a base station to a coordinating server; receiving a warning request message from an operator core network containing an emergency area; calculating a geographic area corresponding to an emergency tracking area by translating the emergency area from a set of base stations to the geographic area; determining whether the base station may be outside of a threshold distance from the geographic boundary of the emergency tracking area; and sending the warning request message when the base station may be within the threshold distance from the geographic boundary of the emergency tracking area.