Vehicle Environmental Control System Polling Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current environmental control systems in vehicles, such as aircraft, lack the ability to efficiently and collaboratively manage requests from multiple users for environmental device settings like lighting and temperature, often prioritizing individual preferences over collective wishes and failing to provide timely responses to passenger needs.

Innovation Solution

A method integrating a control unit with user interface devices that monitors and synthesizes user inputs to operate environmental devices, using a polling mechanism to determine majority preferences and adjust settings accordingly, with a weighting system to prioritize passengers closest to the devices, ensuring collaborative control and timely responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If individual user preferences are prioritized in environmental control systems, then individual comfort is improved, but collaborative control and collective satisfaction deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndividual user comfort controlVSAvoidCollaborative control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the passenger cabin into multiple zones, each with its own environmental control capabilities. This allows different groups of passengers to have customized environmental settings while maintaining overall system coordination through the polling mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where user preferences are polled, processed, and used to adjust environmental settings. The feedback mechanism ensures that individual preferences are captured and aggregated to achieve collective satisfaction through iterative adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If environmental control systems respond to all user requests individually, then individual responsiveness is improved, but system complexity and processing time worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveResponse time to user requestsVSAvoidControl system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic polling to gather user preferences at scheduled intervals rather than continuously processing every individual request in real-time. This periodic approach reduces processing complexity while maintaining responsive control through regular updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple individual user requests into aggregated zone-level decisions. By combining individual preferences through the polling and processing mechanism, the system reduces the number of separate control actions needed while maintaining responsiveness to user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If environmental control systems use simple individual preference detection, then system simplicity is improved, but collaborative decision-making and majority preference identification deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveControl system simplicityVSAvoidCollective preference information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops that continuously gather and process user preferences, ensuring that collective information is captured and utilized. The polling mechanism provides structured feedback that preserves preference information while maintaining system simplicity through standardized data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed with universal polling and processing capabilities that can handle both individual and collective preference detection through the same mechanism. This multi-functional approach preserves information integrity while avoiding the need for separate complex systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2647570B1Environment control system
Publication Date: 2014.03.12 AIRBUS (SAS)
  • EP2647570B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2647570B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2647570B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

This invention provides an environmental control system (ECS) (26) integrated into a vehicle. The ECS comprises at least one environmental device (22); (122); (222) and a plurality of user interface devices (20), (21) linked to a control unit (24). The control unit operates the at least one environmental device depending on a majority of inputs received from the plurality of user interface devices (20), (21) in such a way that, in-use, the collaborative wishes of users controls the environmental device.