Traveling Vehicle Escalator Ejection Control via Multi-Sensor Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traveling vehicles designed to ride on escalators face issues with ejection when sensors such as inclination meters and revolution counters become abnormal, leading to potential sticking of wheels on the floor, and the addition of dedicated sensors for detection complicates the structure and increases power consumption.

Innovation Solution

The vehicle employs multiple detecting devices, including a first detecting device for the drive wheel, a second for surrounding conditions, and a third for inclination angle, allowing the controller to switch control modes for ejection based on determinations from these devices without additional dedicated sensors, ensuring timely ejection even with sensor abnormalities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a dedicated sensor is added to detect ejection timing, then reliability of ejection detection is improved, but device complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection detection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by enabling existing sensors (inclination meter and revolution counter) to serve dual purposes: normal vehicle operation control and ejection timing detection. The controller analyzes data from these sensors to determine ejection timing, eliminating the need for dedicated ejection sensors while maintaining detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses self-service by having the existing sensor network detect ejection timing without external dedicated sensors. The inclination meter and revolution counter automatically provide data that the controller processes to determine when ejection should occur, making the system self-sufficient for ejection detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If the inclination meter is used to detect ejection timing, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to sensor abnormality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system complexityVSAvoidinclination detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring data from both the inclination meter and revolution counter, comparing their readings against expected ranges, and using this feedback to determine ejection timing. The controller adjusts its detection logic based on the consistency and validity of sensor data, ensuring reliable ejection detection even when one sensor exhibits abnormality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies beforehand cushioning by preparing compensatory detection methods in advance. When the inclination meter or revolution counter shows abnormality, the controller automatically switches to using the other sensor for ejection timing detection, preventing measurement precision deterioration without requiring additional sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Device complexity

If the revolution counter is used to detect ejection timing, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to sensor abnormality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system complexityVSAvoidrotation speed detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors revolution counter data and compares it against expected rotation speed ranges. When abnormality is detected, the feedback mechanism triggers a switch to using inclination meter data for ejection timing determination, maintaining measurement precision without adding complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares compensatory detection pathways in advance by having both sensors operational and calibrated. When the revolution counter becomes abnormal, the pre-configured fallback to inclination meter-based detection ensures continuous accurate ejection timing detection without requiring additional sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Reliability

If additional sensors are installed for ejection detection, then reliability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection detection reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves multi-functionality by programming the controller to use existing sensor data for dual purposes: normal vehicle control and ejection timing detection. This eliminates the need for additional power-consuming sensors while maintaining reliable ejection detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system serves itself by having the existing sensor network and controller handle both normal operation and ejection detection functions. No additional power-consuming components are introduced, as the current sensor system automatically provides the necessary data for reliable ejection timing determination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10266097B2Traveling vehicle and method of controlling the traveling vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US10266097B2 patent drawing
  • US10266097B2 patent drawing
  • US10266097B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When a vehicle body is on board an escalator, a control device makes an ejection determination by use of an external sensor. The control device makes an ejection determination by use of front-wheel rotation sensors. The control device makes an ejection determination by use of an inclination detecting unit. The control device switches a control mode from a boarding control mode to an ejection control mode, when at least one of the above three ejection determinations is affirmatively made.