Vehicle Event Recording for Multi-Object Contact Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for determining contact events between target objects and a host vehicle are not reliable, as they often rely solely on acceleration or angular velocity, which do not account for the varying behavior characteristics of different objects, leading to uncertain event recording.

Innovation Solution

An event recording system that uses external sensors to detect and record contact events by determining the type, moving speed, and overlap of target objects, including road users and installations, and adjusts control parameters to track and record these events effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If contact event determination relies solely on acceleration or angular velocity, then the detection process is simple, but the reliability of contact event detection deteriorates due to varying behavior characteristics of different objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact event detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes detection parameters by considering multiple factors (type, moving speed, overlap) instead of relying on a single parameter like acceleration or angular velocity. This allows the detection system to adapt to varying behavior characteristics of different target objects, improving reliability without requiring completely new detection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the contact event determination criteria based on the specific characteristics of target objects. By evaluating type, moving speed, and overlap dynamically, the system can adapt its detection threshold and methodology to match the behavior patterns of different objects, thereby improving detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple parameters (type, moving speed, overlap) are considered for contact event determination, then detection accuracy improves, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact event detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into distinct evaluation stages: first determining the type of target object, then assessing its moving speed, and finally evaluating overlap. This segmentation allows each parameter to be processed independently using specialized algorithms, improving overall detection accuracy while managing complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal determination framework that handles multiple target object types (vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, animals) through a common set of evaluation criteria. This multi-functional approach allows the same processing logic to be applied across different object types, improving detection accuracy without proportionally increasing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If sensor control parameters are adjusted dynamically during tracking, then event recording accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent recording accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the tracking state of target objects and adjusting sensor control parameters accordingly. When a contact event is detected or suspected, the system feeds back this information to modify sensor parameters (such as sampling rate, detection range, or focus), thereby improving event recording accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary adjustment of sensor parameters in anticipation of potential contact events. By proactively modifying detection parameters when target objects enter critical zones or exhibit suspicious motion patterns, the system prepares for accurate event recording before the actual contact occurs, improving recording accuracy while avoiding the need for complex real-time parameter changes during the event itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240161607A1Event recording system, event recording device, and event recording method
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 DENSO CORP
  • US20240161607A1 patent drawing
  • US20240161607A1 patent drawing
  • US20240161607A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A contact event occurring in a vicinity of a host vehicle equipped with an external sensor for detecting detection information of an external environment is recorded. It is determined whether the contact event occurs at a plurality of target objects including at least one type of a road user and a road installation object other than the host vehicle, based on a type, a moving speed, and overlap of the target objects. A pair of the target objects determined that the contact event occurs is tracked, and the detection information is recorded. A control parameter of the external sensor is adjusted according to the tracking of the pair while the host vehicle continues travelling.