Vehicle Event Detection via Occupant Dialogue Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current advanced drive support systems in vehicles fail to resolve ambiguity or insufficiency in detected events, leading to incomplete notification of nearby vehicles about potential hazards.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that involve a computing device storing event candidate information, generating dialogues with vehicle occupants to clarify ambiguities, and reporting events only when information is sufficient, ensuring accurate notification to nearby vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If event candidate information is stored and processed without verification dialogue, then processing speed is improved, but information accuracy and completeness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent processing speedVSAvoidevent information accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by storing event candidate information immediately when detected, then subsequently initiates verification dialogues with nearby vehicles. This allows the system to prepare event data in advance while still verifying its accuracy before final notification, thus maintaining both processing speed and information accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by establishing dialogues with occupants of nearby vehicles to verify event candidate information. The verification results feed back into the system to confirm or correct the event data, ensuring accuracy while maintaining efficient processing through structured feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If verification dialogue with vehicle occupants is conducted, then information accuracy is improved, but system complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent information accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by leveraging existing vehicle occupants as information sources through automated dialogues. This intermediary verification method simplifies the overall system architecture compared to deploying additional sensors or detection devices, as it reuses the human information sources already present in nearby vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The verification dialogue system serves multiple functions: it verifies event accuracy, collects additional contextual information, and potentially identifies other hazards. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate verification systems, thereby managing complexity while improving information accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If event notification is sent without verification, then response time to nearby vehicles is improved, but reliability of hazard information deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification response timeVSAvoidhazard information reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares event candidate information and identifies nearby vehicles in advance, then quickly initiates verification dialogues. This preliminary preparation minimizes the time penalty of verification, while the subsequent rapid notification process ensures that once verification is complete, alerts are sent immediately to nearby vehicles, maintaining both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements rapid feedback loops where verification results are immediately processed and used to determine whether to send notifications. This fast feedback mechanism ensures that reliable information reaches nearby vehicles with minimal delay, balancing notification speed with information reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of information

If multiple dialogues are conducted with different vehicle occupants, then information completeness is improved, but time loss and processing duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent information completenessVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into priority levels, with critical information verified first through dialogues with the first available vehicle occupant. Less critical or supplementary information is then verified through additional dialogues if time permits. This segmentation allows the system to achieve essential information completeness while managing verification time through prioritized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial verification by conducting dialogues with a limited number of vehicle occupants (e.g., first one or two available) rather than all possible nearby vehicles. This partial action approach achieves sufficient information completeness for safety-critical decisions while avoiding excessive time loss that would result from verifying with every nearby vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10885280B2Event detection with conversation
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10885280B2 patent drawing
  • US10885280B2 patent drawing
  • US10885280B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and computer program product are provided. At least some received event candidate information concerning a possible event is stored as an event candidate in a database. A dialogue is generated with an occupant of a vehicle located in a vicinity of the possible event to obtain and store information to resolve any insufficiency or ambiguity regarding the event candidate in the database. When the information stored in the database regarding the event candidate is determined to be sufficient and unambiguous the event candidate is made into an event in the database. The event is reported to at least one vehicle approaching a location corresponding to the event.