Vehicle Travel Plan Selection Under Restricted Driving Scenes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems face delays in reaction time when encountering restricted traveling scenes, such as parallel-traveling cars or lane reductions, leading to inefficiencies in generated traveling plans.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device and method that determine restricted scenes, set priorities for driving behaviors, generate and select executable traveling plans, and control the vehicle based on the highest-priority plan, reducing the need for new plan generation and minimizing delays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traveling plan is generated based on a determined driving behavior, then the traveling plan corresponds to the intended driving behavior, but the reaction time is delayed when the driving behavior becomes inexecutable due to restricted traveling scenes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecutability of driving behaviorVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining executability of driving behaviors before generating traveling plans, and by pre-setting alternative driving behaviors in priority order. This allows the system to quickly select alternative behaviors when restrictions are detected, avoiding delays in generating new traveling plans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the selection of driving behaviors based on real-time executability assessments. When a determined driving behavior is found to be inexecutable due to restricted traveling scenes, the system flexibly transitions to alternative driving behaviors from the priority-ordered list, ensuring continuous adaptability without fixed procedural delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If new traveling plans are generated when driving behaviors are inexecutable, then the system adapts to restricted scenes, but the control reaction is delayed due to the time required for new plan generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to restricted traveling scenesVSAvoidplan generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessments of driving behavior executability before finalizing traveling plans. By evaluating whether determined driving behaviors can be executed in restricted traveling scenes in advance, the system identifies inexecutable behaviors early and prepares alternative options, reducing the time needed for adaptive plan generation when restrictions are encountered.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system serves itself by maintaining a priority-ordered list of alternative driving behaviors that can be quickly selected when determined behaviors are inexecutable. This self-service mechanism allows the system to adapt to restricted traveling scenes using pre-prepared alternatives rather than requiring time-consuming generation of entirely new traveling plans from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system determines executability before selecting traveling plans, then the reliability of selected plans is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of traveling plan selectionVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial executability determination focused on key aspects of driving behavior feasibility rather than comprehensive analysis of all possible factors. By assessing only the critical elements needed to determine whether a driving behavior can be executed in restricted scenes, the system achieves sufficient reliability for plan selection while minimizing processing time overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses pre-established priority orderings of alternative driving behaviors to streamline the selection process. When executability determination identifies inexecutable behaviors, the system can quickly select from pre-ranked alternatives without requiring complex optimization calculations, thereby maintaining high reliability in plan selection while preserving processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11835956B2Vehicle control device and vehicle control method
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11835956B2 patent drawing
  • US11835956B2 patent drawing
  • US11835956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device includes a scene determination unit determining whether or not a current traveling scene is a traveling-restricted scene, an order setting unit setting priorities corresponding to a restriction with respect to driving behaviors previously classified for different purposes in a case where it is determined that the traveling scene is the traveling-restricted scene and setting priorities with respect to the plurality of driving behaviors in a case where it is not determined that the traveling scene is the traveling-restricted scene, a traveling plan generating unit generating traveling plans corresponding to the plurality of priority-set driving behaviors, an executability determination unit determining executability of each of the plurality of generated driving behaviors, a traveling plan selection unit selecting the traveling plan corresponding to the driving behavior with the highest priority, and a traveling control unit controlling the traveling of the host vehicle based on the traveling plan.