Vehicle Failure Detection via Leading Indicator Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for detecting vehicle parts failures rely on historical data, which is a lagging indicator and fails to capture all customer issues, leading to a longer detection cycle and potential cascading failures.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that identifies discriminative rules from structured and unstructured data to map causal part categories with subsystems, assigning scores based on occurrence patterns and weightages to predict emerging issues and detect failures early.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If historical failure data is used to model failure rate of vehicle parts, then the detection system is simple to implement, but the detection cycle is prolonged and leading indicators are not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection cycleVSAvoiddata integration system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by integrating leading indicators (customer complaints, sensor data) before actual failures occur. This allows early detection of emerging issues by analyzing patterns in unstructured and structured data sources, enabling preventive action before cascading failures happen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments data from multiple sources (unstructured customer complaints, structured sensor data, warranty claims) and processes them separately through specialized modules. Each data type is analyzed using appropriate techniques, then integrated to provide comprehensive failure detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If only structured data is used for failure detection, then data processing is straightforward, but customer issues and leading indicators are not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges unstructured data (customer complaints, service records) with structured data (sensor readings, warranty claims) into a unified analysis framework. This combination captures both customer-observed leading indicators and technical failure data, improving detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary processing layers including natural language processing for unstructured data and pattern recognition algorithms that bridge different data types. These intermediaries transform diverse data sources into comparable formats for integrated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If conventional warranty claim data is used, then data collection is simple, but the data is a lagging indicator and does not capture emerging failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure prediction accuracyVSAvoidfailure detection timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes leading indicators from customer complaints and sensor data before failures actually occur. By detecting patterns in this preliminary data, the system predicts emerging failures ahead of time, enabling preventive maintenance before parts actually fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes feedback loops where detected patterns from unstructured data trigger enhanced monitoring of related structured data sources. This feedback mechanism amplifies signals of emerging failures and adjusts detection sensitivity based on observed patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10589749B2Method and system for early detection of vehicle parts failure
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US10589749B2 patent drawing
  • US10589749B2 patent drawing
  • US10589749B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System and method for early detection of vehicle parts failure are disclosed. The method includes identifying discriminative rules from unstructured and structured data corresponding to subsystems of a vehicle. Causal parts categories are mapped to the subsystems based on the discriminative rules to obtain a plurality of causal part-subsystem pairs. The causal part categories are representative of vehicle parts responsible for failure of corresponding subsystems. Scores are assigned to the causal part-subsystem pairs based on an occurrence of causal part categories to a corresponding subsystem within a source. An emerging issue score is computed based on the scores, a corresponding weightage associated with the sources of the causal part category, and an extent of coverage of the each causal part in each of the plurality of causal part-subsystem pairs. The emerging issue score is compared with the threshold vehicle part failure score to identify causal part categories associated with vehicle parts failure.