Vehicle Component Failure Prediction Using ML Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle monitoring systems fail to accurately predict component failures, leading to sudden vehicle breakdowns, increased repair costs, and driver anxiety, as they lack effective methods for assessing the severity of impending failures.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing machine learning techniques to process sensor data from vehicle components, separating data into characteristic sets based on operating characteristics, and using predictive models to detect anomalies and determine the severity of failures, thereby providing customized alerts to drivers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning techniques are used to process sensor data for failure prediction, then prediction accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor data is separated into multiple characteristic data sets based on different operating characteristics (e.g., engine load, temperature, speed). Each data set is processed independently through the predictive model, allowing the system to handle complexity in a modular fashion while maintaining high prediction accuracy for different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw sensor data into characteristic data sets by applying different processing parameters and transformations based on operating characteristics. This parameter-based approach enables the predictive model to accurately detect anomalies across varying operating conditions without requiring a completely different system for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If severity determination based on operating characteristics is implemented, then alert relevance is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert relevanceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes multiple characteristic data sets corresponding to different operating characteristics before actual failure detection is needed. When sensor data is received, the system quickly matches the current operating conditions to the appropriate pre-defined characteristic data set, enabling rapid severity determination without extensive real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides customized alerts with different levels of detail and urgency based on the specific operating characteristics and severity level detected. Each alert is tailored to the local conditions (specific operating characteristic and anomaly severity), delivering relevant information efficiently without unnecessary processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11704945B2System and method for predicting vehicle component failure and providing a customized alert to the driver
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11704945B2 patent drawing
  • US11704945B2 patent drawing
  • US11704945B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for predicting component failure in a vehicle and alerting a driver based thereon. In an embodiment, the method includes receiving sensor data from at least one vehicle sensor over a period of time, processing the sensor data using a predictive model to detect an anomaly indicative of an upcoming component failure, determining a severity of the upcoming component failure based on at least one operating characteristic of the vehicle, and providing an alert to the driver of the vehicle regarding the severity of the upcoming component failure.