Vehicle Fault Detection Using Unsupervised Sensor Relationships

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fault detection systems in vehicles, such as aircraft, rely on statistical analysis and require domain knowledge, leading to inefficiencies and potential false positives, as they struggle to identify anomalies and relationships between component parameters effectively.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle fault detection system comprising sensors, a vehicle control module, and a user interface that analyzes time series data from multiple components to determine relationships and identify anomalies, reducing dependency on domain experts and improving detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If statistical analysis methods are used for fault detection, then fault detection capability is provided, but false positives occur and domain knowledge is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoiddependency on domain knowledge
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-learning by automatically discovering relationships between component parameters through unsupervised machine learning algorithms. The control module independently identifies anomalies based on learned relationships without requiring external domain knowledge or manual configuration, enabling the system to serve itself in terms of knowledge acquisition and fault detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the approach by changing from traditional statistical analysis parameters to relationship-based parameters. Instead of analyzing individual component parameters in isolation, the system analyzes relationships between multiple component parameters, fundamentally changing the detection parameters to reduce false positives and eliminate dependency on domain knowledge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional statistical analysis is applied to time series data, then fault detection is performed, but relationships between component parameters are not effectively identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidrelationship information between components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple sensors monitoring different component parameters and combines them for joint analysis. By integrating information from multiple components and analyzing their relationships together rather than separately, the system effectively identifies relationships between component parameters that would be lost in isolated statistical analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a new dimension to the analysis by introducing relationship analysis between component parameters. Instead of analyzing each component parameter in a single dimension independently, the system creates a multi-dimensional analysis space that includes relationships between components, thereby preserving and utilizing relationship information that traditional methods lose

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11315027B2Unsupervised multivariate relational fault detection system for a vehicle and method therefor
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 THE BOEING CO
  • US11315027B2 patent drawing
  • US11315027B2 patent drawing
  • US11315027B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle fault detection system including a vehicle control module coupled to a plurality of vehicle system sensors configured to detect respective time series of data corresponding to a component parameter, the vehicle control module determines, based on domain knowledge obtained by the vehicle control module from only the respective time series of data, an existence of one or more relationships between the plurality of component parameters, and identifies an anomaly in the respective time series of data and at least a vehicle component to be serviced based only on the domain knowledge and the one or more relationships between the plurality of component parameters. An indication of the anomaly in the respective time series of data and an identification of the vehicle component to be serviced are to be presented as a graphical representation that includes a strength of the one or more relationships between the component parameters.