Vehicle Frame Front Module Reducing Saddle Neck Height

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle frame front modules for semi-trailers face challenges in reducing the saddle neck height while maintaining structural rigidity and avoiding weight increases, which limits the loading volume and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle frame front module design featuring a main plate-shaped member with filler plate-shaped members of varying thicknesses, radially extending second main element areas, and plate-shaped filling elements that optimize supporting forces and provide torsional stiffness, allowing for a reduced saddle neck height and increased loading space without excessive weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the saddle neck height is reduced to increase loading space, then the loading volume increases, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading volumeVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The front module is segmented into a plate-shaped main element with multiple plate-shaped filling elements arranged radially. This segmentation allows the structure to achieve the required rigidity with thinner individual components, reducing overall weight while maintaining loading volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The front module uses a composite structure combining a plate-shaped main element with multiple plate-shaped filling elements of different thicknesses. This composite design optimizes the strength-to-weight ratio, allowing reduced saddle neck height without excessive weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Volume of moving object

If the saddle neck height is reduced, then the loading space increases, but the structural rigidity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading spaceVSAvoidstructural rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the front module have different plate thicknesses optimized for their specific functions. The plate-shaped filling elements have varying thicknesses to provide local reinforcement where needed while maintaining overall rigidity with reduced weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The plate-shaped filling elements are arranged in a radial pattern around the kingpin, creating a curved, star-like structure. This radial arrangement optimally distributes supporting forces from the fifth wheel coupling plate through the kingpin into the ground, enhancing structural rigidity while allowing reduced saddle neck height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Strength

If a carrier structure is used to maintain rigidity, then structural strength is improved, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single heavy carrier structure, the front module is divided into a plate-shaped main element and multiple lighter plate-shaped filling elements. This segmentation achieves the required structural strength with significantly reduced weight compared to a traditional carrier structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The radial arrangement of plate-shaped filling elements creates an optimized force distribution pattern that replaces the need for a heavy carrier structure. The curved, radial geometry naturally distributes loads efficiently, providing structural strength without excessive weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Reliability

If the plate-shaped filling elements are welded to the plate-shaped main element, then structural integrity is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The front module is manufactured as segmented components (plate-shaped main element and plate-shaped filling elements) that can be produced separately and then assembled through welding. This segmentation allows for easier manufacturing of individual parts while maintaining structural integrity through the welding connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively reduces the saddle neck height, increases the loading space, and decreases the overall weight of the semi-trailer, while ensuring structural rigidity and supporting forces are optimally distributed, enhancing the loading capacity and efficiency of the vehicle frame.

Implementation Method 1

The plurality of plate-shaped fillers are inserted into the areas between the plurality of second main-member portions of the plate-shaped main member and welded to the plate-shaped main member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Data Source

PatentEP2990306B1Vehicle frame front module for vehicle trailers
Publication Date: 2016.11.02 FLIEGL HELMUT
  • EP2990306B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2990306B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2990306B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a vehicle frame front module (300) of a vehicle frame (100) of a semi-trailer. The disclosed vehicle frame front module (330) has a plate-shaped main element (310) with a first thickness (T1), and several plate-shaped filler elements (320) with a second thickness (T2) that is smaller than the first thickness (T1). The plate-shaped main element (310) has a first main element region (312) configured to receive a kingpin (120), and several second main element regions (313, 314, 315, 316, 317) configured to extend radially from the first main element region (312) with respect to the kingpin (120). The several plate-shaped filler elements (320) are inserted into the areas between the several second main element areas (313, 314, 315, 316, 317) and welded to the plate-shaped main element (310).